V SftApplication · Fujielectric

CVE-2022-29925

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.1.6.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Access of uninitialized pointer vulnerability exists in the simulator module contained in the graphic editor 'V-SFT' versions prior to v6.1.6.0, which may allow an attacker to obtain information and/or execute arbitrary code by having a user to open a specially crafted image file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An access of uninitialized pointer vulnerability exists in the simulator module of the V-SFT graphic editor versions prior to v6.1.6.0. The vulnerability can be triggered when a user opens a specially crafted image file, potentially allowing an attacker to read sensitive information from memory or achieve arbitrary code execution due to the uninitialized pointer dereference.

MitigationUpgrade V-SFT to version 6.1.6.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Until upgraded, refrain from opening image files from untrusted sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
V SftApplication
Affected:< 6.1.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the V-SFT installation
    Search for V-SFT in the program files directory (typically C:\Program Files\Fujielectric or C:\Program Files (x86)\Fujielectric) or check the Windows registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Fujielectric or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Fujielectric
    Affected if V-SFT is found on the system
  2. Determine the installed version of V-SFT
    Right-click the V-SFT executable (typically named V-SFT.exe or similar), select Properties, and check the Details tab for the product version. Alternatively, open V-SFT and navigate to Help > About to view the version information
    Affected if The version displayed is lower than 6.1.6.0
  3. Verify the simulator module is accessible
    Launch V-SFT and confirm the simulator module can be opened. Look for a simulator function or menu item within the application
    Affected if The simulator module is present and accessible
  4. Identify if untrusted image files have been opened recently
    Check the recent files list within V-SFT or examine the file system for recently opened image files with extensions used by V-SFT (such as .vsd, .vtf, or project-related image files)
    Affected if Image files from untrusted or unknown sources have been opened in the simulator module

A system is affected if V-SFT version is installed and the installed version is lower than 6.1.6.0, since the uninitialized pointer vulnerability exists in the simulator module when processing crafted image files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.1.6.0 or later
Fixed in 6.1.6.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade V-SFT to version 6.1.6.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Until upgraded, refrain from opening image files from untrusted sources.

Recommended fix High confidence

v6.1.6.0

  1. Navigate to the official Fuji Electric download page for V-SFT (monitouch.fujielectric.com)
  2. Locate the V-SFT graphic editor software
  3. Download version 6.1.6.0 or later
  4. Verify the downloaded file's integrity if hash verification is available
  5. Uninstall the current version of V-SFT if already installed
  6. Install the downloaded v6.1.6.0 or later version
  7. Restart any running applications that may use V-SFT

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in V Sft Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29925 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data