CVE-2022-26318
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn WatchGuard Firebox and XTM appliances, an unauthenticated user can execute arbitrary code, aka FBX-22786. This vulnerability impacts Fireware OS before 12.7.2_U2, 12.x before 12.1.3_U8, and 12.2.x through 12.5.x before 12.5.9_U2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in WatchGuard Firebox and XTM appliances allows attackers to execute arbitrary code without credentials via vulnerable Fireware OS versions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.0.0, < 12.1.3>= 12.5, < 12.5.9>= 12.7.0, < 12.7.2= 12.1.3= 12.5.9= 12.7.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the appliance modelAccess the device's web management interface or use CLI command 'sysctl hw.model' or check physical labeling to confirm it is a WatchGuard Firebox or XTM appliance.Affected if The device is NOT a WatchGuard Firebox or XTM appliance.
-
Determine the Fireware OS versionLog into the Firebox web UI, go to Dashboard or System > About, and note the Fireware OS version number displayed. Alternatively, use CLI command 'fireware -v' or 'version' to retrieve the version.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 12.0.0 through 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.5.0 through 12.5.8, 12.5.9, 12.7.0 through 12.7.1, or 12.7.2.
-
Verify management interface exposureReview firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the Firebox management interface (HTTPS admin port 443 or HTTP port 80) is accessible from external networks or the internet.Affected if TCP ports 443 or 80 used for Firebox management are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet.
-
Check for unauthorized access or tamperingReview system logs in Firebox UI under Log > System Logs for unusual authentication attempts, unexpected processes, or unfamiliar administrative accounts. Compare current configuration against known-good backups.Affected if Logs show unauthorized administrative sessions, unknown accounts, or configuration changes not made by your team.
The environment is affected if the device is a WatchGuard Firebox or XTM running a Fireware OS version in the affected list AND the management interface is externally accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.1.312.5.912.7.2
Upgrade Fireware OS to version 12.7.2_U2, 12.1.3_U8, or 12.5.9_U2 or later. If patching is not immediately feasible, restrict management interface access to trusted networks using firewall rules or VPN.
12.1.3_U8 (for 12.x branch), 12.5.9_U2 (for 12.5.x branch), or 12.7.2_U2 (for 12.7.x branch) depending on starting version
- 1. Identify the current Fireware OS version by accessing the Firebox management interface or using the wgCLI 'fireware' command.
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on current version: if running 12.0.0-12.1.2, upgrade to 12.1.3_U8; if running 12.5.0-12.5.8, upgrade to 12.5.9_U2; if running 12.7.0-12.7.1, upgrade to 12.7.2_U2.
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware image from the WatchGuard support portal (www.watchguard.com/support/firmware.html).
- 4. Upload the firmware file through the Firebox Web UI (System > Firmware) or via the wgCLI 'firmware upload' command.
- 5. Reboot the appliance to apply the new firmware.
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful and confirm the running version matches the expected patched version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-26318 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-26318 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data