CVE-2025-14733
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the WatchGuard Fireware OS iked process may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects both the mobile user VPN with IKEv2 and the branch office VPN using IKEv2 when configured with a dynamic gateway peer. If the Firebox was previously configured with the mobile user VPN with IKEv2 or a branch office VPN using IKEv2 to a dynamic gateway peer, and both of those configurations have since been deleted, that Firebox may still be vulnerable if a branch office VPN to a static gateway peer is still configured.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the WatchGuard Fireware OS iked process allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed IKEv2 packets. The vulnerability affects mobile user VPN with IKEv2 and branch office VPN using IKEv2 with dynamic gateway peers, and persists even after those configurations are deleted if a static gateway branch office VPN remains.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.10.2, < 12.5.15>= 11.10.2, < 12.11.6>= 2025.1, < 2025.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Fireware OS versionLog into the Firebox web UI and navigate to System > About, or use the CLI command 'fwc -v' or 'version' to display the installed firmware version.Affected if The installed version is 11.10.2 or higher but below 12.5.15, OR 12.11.6 or higher but below 2025.1.4, OR 2025.1.0 through 2025.1.3.
-
Verify IKEv2 VPN is enabledIn the Firebox web UI, navigate to VPN > Mobile User VPN and VPN > Branch Office VPN to see if IKEv2 VPN configurations exist. In CLI, use 'show vpn' or similar commands to list active VPN configurations.Affected if Any IKEv2 VPN configuration exists for Mobile User VPN or Branch Office VPN.
-
Identify dynamic gateway peer configurationIn the Firebox web UI, examine the IKEv2 VPN gateway settings for both Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN. Look for peer configurations set to 'Dynamic' or 'Dynamic IP Address'. In CLI, examine the IKEv2 phase 1 configuration for dynamic peer settings.Affected if The IKEv2 VPN gateway is configured with a dynamic gateway peer (dynamic IP address) rather than a static peer IP.
The environment is affected if the Fireware OS version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND IKEv2 VPN is configured with a dynamic gateway peer for either Mobile User VPN or Branch Office VPN.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.5.1512.11.62025.1.4
Apply WatchGuard's available firmware patches for Fireware OS to address this vulnerability in the iked process.
Fireware 12.11.6 or later (for 11.x/12.x branches); Fireware 2025.1.4 or later (for 2025.1 branch)
- 1. Identify the currently running Fireware OS version by logging into the Firebox management interface or checking the device status.
- 2. Determine which version branch is currently in use (11.x, 12.x, or 2025.1).
- 3. For Fireware 11.x versions (11.10.2 through 11.12.4_Update1): Upgrade to Fireware 12.11.6 or later.
- 4. For Fireware 12.x versions (12.0 through 12.11.5): Upgrade to Fireware 12.11.6 or later.
- 5. For Fireware 2025.1 versions (2025.1 through 2025.1.3): Upgrade to Fireware 2025.1.4 or later.
- 6. Download the appropriate firmware image from the WatchGuard support portal (www.watchguard.com).
- 7. Upload and apply the firmware upgrade through the Firebox management interface or Fireware Web UI.
- 8. After upgrading, verify that the Mobile User VPN (IKEv2) and Branch Office VPN (IKEv2) configurations are functioning correctly with the dynamic gateway peer settings.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-14733 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-14733 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data