Mtm5500 FirmwareOperating system · Motorola

CVE-2022-27813

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack properly configured memory protection of pages shared between the OMAP-L138 ARM and DSP cores. The SoC provides two memory protection units, MPU1 and MPU2, to enforce the trust boundary between the two cores. Since both units are left unconfigured by the firmwares, an adversary with control over either core can trivially gain code execution on the other, by overwriting code located in shared RAM or DDR2 memory regions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Motorola MTM5000 series firmware leaves both memory protection units (MPU1 and MPU2) on the OMAP-L138 SoC unconfigured, failing to enforce the trust boundary between the ARM and DSP cores. An attacker who compromises either core can write to shared RAM or DDR2 memory regions, enabling arbitrary code execution on the other core.

MitigationConfigure MPU1 and MPU2 to enforce memory protection boundaries between the ARM and DSP cores, restricting write access to shared memory regions to only authorized code and establishing proper access control policies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mtm5500 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Mtm5400 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm device model
    Identify if the target device is a Motorola Mtm5500 or Mtm5400 unit by checking the device firmware identification, boot logs, or hardware labeling
    Affected if The device is not a Motorola Mtm5500 or Mtm5400 model
  2. Access OMAP-L138 SoC configuration
    Obtain access to the device firmware image or runtime memory configuration for the OMAP-L138 SoC, typically through firmware extraction, debug interfaces, or memory dump procedures specific to the hardware
    Affected if Unable to access the OMAP-L138 SoC configuration data
  3. Inspect MPU1 configuration
    Examine the Memory Protection Unit 1 (MPU1) registers or configuration settings within the OMAP-L138 SoC memory map to determine if memory protection boundaries between ARM and DSP cores are defined
    Affected if MPU1 registers show default/unconfigured state with no memory regions defined or access restrictions set between cores
  4. Inspect MPU2 configuration
    Examine the Memory Protection Unit 2 (MPU2) registers or configuration settings within the OMAP-L138 SoC memory map to determine if protection for shared RAM and DDR2 memory regions is configured
    Affected if MPU2 registers show default/unconfigured state with no access control policies enforced for shared memory regions

The device is affected if it is a Motorola Mtm5500 or Mtm5400 unit where MPU1 and MPU2 remain in their default unconfigured state, allowing unrestricted write access to shared RAM or DDR2 memory from either the ARM or DSP core.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Configure MPU1 and MPU2 to enforce memory protection boundaries between the ARM and DSP cores, restricting write access to shared memory regions to only authorized code and establishing proper access control policies.

Fix this in Mtm5500 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-27813 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-27813 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data