CVE-2022-3088
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUC-8100A-ME-T System Image: Versions v1.0 to v1.6, UC-2100 System Image: Versions v1.0 to v1.12, UC-2100-W System Image: Versions v1.0 to v 1.12, UC-3100 System Image: Versions v1.0 to v1.6, UC-5100 System Image: Versions v1.0 to v1.4, UC-8100 System Image: Versions v3.0 to v3.5, UC-8100-ME-T System Image: Versions v3.0 and v3.1, UC-8200 System Image: v1.0 to v1.5, AIG-300 System Image: v1.0 to v1.4, UC-8410A with Debian 9 System Image: Versions v4.0.2 and v4.1.2, UC-8580 with Debian 9 System Image: Versions v2.0 and v2.1, UC-8540 with Debian 9 System Image: Versions v2.0 and v2.1, and DA-662C-16-LX (GLB) System Image: Versions v1.0.2 to v1.1.2 of Moxa's ARM-based computers have an execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability, which could allow an attacker with user-level privileges to gain root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple Moxa ARM-based computer systems (UC-8100A-ME-T, UC-2100, UC-2100-W, UC-3100, UC-5100, UC-8100, UC-8200, AIG-300, UC-8410A, UC-8580, UC-8540, DA-662C-16-LX) contain a privilege escalation vulnerability where an attacker with user-level privileges can gain root privileges through execution with unnecessary privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.0, <= 1.12>= 1.0, <= 1.2>= 1.0, <= 1.2>= 1.0, <= 1.2>= 1.0, <= 1.2>= 1.0, <= 1.2>= 1.0, <= 1.2>= 1.0, <= 1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Moxa device modelAccess the device console, web interface, or check the device label to confirm the exact model number (e.g., UC-2101-LX, UC-2102-LX, UC-2111-LX, etc.)Affected if The device model matches one of the affected models listed in the CVE (UC-2100 series, UC-5100, UC-8100 series, AIG-300, UC-8410A, UC-8580, UC-8540, DA-662C-16-LX)
-
Determine the firmware versionLog into the device via SSH or console and run the command to check firmware version, typically 'show version' or check through the web interface under System > InformationAffected if The installed firmware version falls within the affected ranges: UC-2101-LX version 1.0 to 1.12, UC-2102-LX version 1.0 to 1.2, UC-2104-LX version 1.0 to 1.2, UC-2111-LX version 1.0 to 1.2, UC-2112-LX version 1.0 to 1.2, UC-2102T-LX version 1.0 to 1.2, UC-2114T-LX version 1.0 to 1.2, or UC-2116T-LX
-
Verify presence of non-root user accountsCheck for existing user accounts on the device by examining /etc/passwd or using 'cat /etc/shadow' (if accessible) or listing users via the web interface under User ManagementAffected if Non-root user accounts exist on the device, providing an attack vector for privilege escalation
-
Check for unusual process execution with elevated privilegesReview system logs and running processes for any user-level processes executing with root or elevated privileges, using commands like 'ps aux' or reviewing /var/log/messagesAffected if User-level processes are observed running with root-level privileges, indicating the vulnerability may be exploited
The environment is affected if the device is a Moxa ARM-based system (particularly UC-2100 series variants) running firmware within the listed version ranges and non-root user accounts have access to the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware updates to affected devices to patch the privilege escalation vulnerability. Until patches are available, minimize user access and monitor for suspicious privilege escalation attempts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation10.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,944.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-3088 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-3088 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data