CVE-2022-31465
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Xpedition Designer VX.2.10 (All versions < VX.2.10 Update 13), Xpedition Designer VX.2.11 (All versions < VX.2.11 Update 11), Xpedition Designer VX.2.12 (All versions < VX.2.12 Update 5), Xpedition Designer VX.2.13 (All versions < VX.2.13 Update 1). The affected application assigns improper access rights to the service executable. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to inject arbitrary code and escalate privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceXpedition Designer VX assigns improper access rights to its service executable, allowing an authenticated local user to modify or replace the service binary. This enables arbitrary code injection and privilege escalation from a standard user account to elevated (SYSTEM) privileges through the service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< vx.2.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Siemens Xpedition Designer is installedCheck for the presence of Xpedition Designer in installed programs via Windows Registry (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall) or look for the installation directory in typical locations such as C:\Siemens\ or C:\Program Files\Siemens\Affected if Xpedition Designer is found on the system
-
Determine the installed version of Xpedition DesignerLocate the version information in the installation directory or registry. Common locations include the main executable properties or README files within the Siemens\Xpedition folderAffected if Installed version is lower than vx.2.11 (e.g., vx.2.10, vx.2.9, or earlier)
-
Identify the Xpedition Designer service executableOpen Services management console (services.msc) and locate the Siemens/Xpedition service entries. Note the path to the executable listed in the service propertiesAffected if A service executable path is identified for Xpedition Designer
-
Check write permissions on the service executableRight-click the service executable file, go to Properties > Security tab, and examine the Write permission entries for users or groups. Alternatively, use icacls from command line: icacls "<path_to_service_exe>"Affected if Standard users or authenticated users have Write or Write-Owner permissions on the service executable file
-
Verify if the service runs with elevated privilegesIn Services management console, double-click the Xpedition Designer service and check the 'Log on as' setting. If it is set to Local System or a privileged account, the vulnerability is exploitableAffected if The service runs under Local System, SYSTEM, or another privileged account
A user is affected if Xpedition Designer version is below vx.2.11 AND standard users have write access to the service executable that runs with elevated privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Xpedition Designer VX to the patched version (VX.2.10 Update 13, VX.2.11 Update 11, VX.2.12 Update 5, or VX.2.13 Update 1 or later). Alternatively, restrict write access to the service executable location to administrators only.
Xpedition Designer VX.2.13 Update 1 (or respective branch minimum: VX.2.10 Update 13, VX.2.11 Update 11, VX.2.12 Update 5)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Xpedition Designer version and update level
- 2. Based on your current version branch, determine the minimum required update: if using VX.2.10, upgrade to Update 13 or later; if VX.2.11, upgrade to Update 11 or later; if VX.2.12, upgrade to Update 5 or later; if VX.2.13, upgrade to Update 1 or later
- 3. Obtain the appropriate update package from Siemens support (cert-portal.siemens.com or official Siemens distribution channels)
- 4. Apply the update following Siemens standard installation procedures
- 5. Verify the update was successful by checking the application's version information
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31465 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31465 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data