CVE-2022-32152
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSplunk Enterprise peers in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203 did not validate the TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. Splunk peer communications configured properly with valid certificates were not vulnerable. However, an attacker with administrator credentials could add a peer without a valid certificate and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates did not fail by default. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSplunk Enterprise peers did not validate TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. An attacker with administrator credentials could add a malicious peer without a valid certificate, and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates would not fail, allowing potential man-in-the-middle attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0< 8.2.2203CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Splunk Enterprise versionRun 'splunk version' from the Splunk bin directory or access Settings > About > Version in the Splunk Web UIAffected if Version is below 9.0 (for Splunk Enterprise)
-
Check Splunk Cloud Platform versionAccess the Cloud Portal or check the instance details in the Splunk Cloud management interfaceAffected if Version is below 8.2.2203 (for Splunk Cloud Platform)
-
Verify TLS certificate validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communicationsExamine the server.conf or sslConfig settings for the clustering or peer communication configuration. Look for settings that enforce TLS hostname validation or certificate verification on the management port or clustering portAffected if TLS hostname validation or certificate verification is not explicitly configured/enabled for peer communications
You are affected if you run Splunk Enterprise below version 9.0 or Splunk Cloud Platform below version 8.2.2203 AND TLS certificate validation is not configured for Splunk-to-Splunk (peer/clustering) communications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.2.22039.0
Update to Splunk Enterprise 9.0 or Splunk Cloud Platform 8.2.2203 and configure TLS hostname validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications to enforce certificate validation.
Splunk Enterprise 9.0 or Splunk Cloud Platform 8.2.2203
- 1. Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to version 9.0 or later, or verify Splunk Cloud Platform is at version 8.2.2203 or later
- 2. Configure TLS hostname validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications using the documentation at https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation
- 3. Review existing peer configurations to ensure all connections use valid certificates
- 4. After applying the upgrade and configuration, verify that peer communications are properly validating TLS certificates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32152 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32152 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data