CVE-2022-32268
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStarWind SAN and NAS v0.2 build 1914 allow remote code execution. A flaw was found in REST API in StarWind Stack. REST command, which allows changing the hostname, doesn’t check a new hostname parameter. It goes directly to bash as part of a script. An attacker with non-root user access can inject arbitrary data into the command that will be executed with root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in StarWind SAN and NAS REST API hostname change function. The hostname parameter is passed unsanitized directly to a bash script, allowing arbitrary command execution with root privileges by any authenticated non-root user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if StarWind SAN and NAS is installedLook for StarWind installation directories (typically /opt/StarWind or C:\Program Files\StarWind) or check installed packages. On Linux, run: find /opt -name '*tar*' -o -name '*star*' 2>/dev/null; on Windows, check Programs and Features for StarWind.Affected if StarWind SAN and NAS software is found on the system
-
Verify the installed version is 0.2Check the StarWind version. On Linux, look for a version file in the installation directory (e.g., /opt/StarWind/VERSION or /opt/StarWind/bin/ starwindd --version). On Windows, check the executable properties or registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\StarWind.Affected if The installed version is exactly 0.2 (the affected version)
-
Confirm the REST API service is enabled and runningCheck if the StarWind REST API service is active. On Linux: systemctl status starwind or ps aux | grep -i starwind. On Windows: check if the StarWind service is running via services.msc. Also check for port 3261 (default REST API port) listening: netstat -an | grep 3261.Affected if The StarWind REST API service is running and listening on network ports
-
Check for non-root authenticated usersReview StarWind user configuration. The vulnerability allows any authenticated non-root user to execute commands. Check user accounts configured in StarWind (typically via StarWind Manager or /opt/StarWind/config/users.conf). Determine if any non-root users exist.Affected if There is at least one non-root user account configured for StarWind authentication
-
Inspect the hostname change API endpointIf REST API is accessible, the vulnerable endpoint is typically /api/hostname or similar. Review any accessible API documentation or configuration files in the StarWind installation for the hostname change function path. Check configuration files in /opt/StarWind/config/ for API endpoint definitions.Affected if The REST API hostname change endpoint exists and is accessible
The environment is affected if StarWind SAN and NAS version 0.2 is installed with the REST API service running and at least one non-root user configured for authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization for the hostname parameter before passing to shell commands. If no patch is available, restrict network access to the REST API and consider disabling the hostname change functionality until a fix is deployed.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32268 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32268 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data