CVE-2022-32740
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA reply to a forwarded email article by a 3rd party could unintensionally expose the email content to the ticket customer under certain circumstances.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in a ticketing/helpdesk system where replies to forwarded email articles can unintentionally expose email content to the ticket customer. When a third party replies to a forwarded email article, the system fails to properly restrict access, allowing the ticket customer to view email content they should not have access to.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.35>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.23CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OTRS versionLocate the OTRS installation directory and check the version file (typically VERSION or Kernel/Config.pm) or run the OTRS system information commandAffected if The installed version is 7.0.0 through 7.0.34, or 8.0.0 through 8.0.22
-
Confirm ticketing system is activeVerify that OTRS is actively running as a helpdesk system with customer-facing ticket access enabledAffected if The system processes customer tickets and allows customers to view ticket articles online
-
Check email article handlingInspect the system configuration for email article processing, specifically whether incoming emails are stored as articles and can be forwardedAffected if Email articles are stored as ticket articles and can be forwarded to third parties
-
Verify customer access to articlesReview the ticket/article access control settings to confirm whether customers can access all article types including forwarded email contentAffected if Customers have access to view email articles without restrictions on reply visibility
-
Test third-party reply visibilityCreate a test ticket with a forwarded email article, then have a third party reply to that forwarded email and verify if the customer can see the third-party replyAffected if Customers can view replies from third parties to forwarded email articles that they should not have access to
A system is affected if it runs OTRS version 7.0.0-7.0.34 or 8.0.0-8.0.22, uses email article forwarding, and allows customers to view third-party replies to forwarded emails.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.358.0.23
Implement proper access control checks on forwarded email content to ensure replies are only visible to authorized parties, and validate that ticket customers cannot view third-party email exchanges.
OTRS 7.0.35 or later / OTRS 8.0.23 or later
- Verify current OTRS version by checking the admin panel or running: bin/otrs.Console.pl Admin::Package::List
- Backup the OTRS database and configuration files before upgrading
- For OTRS 7.x: Download OTRS 7.0.35 or later from the official OTRS website
- For OTRS 8.x: Download OTRS 8.0.23 or later from the official OTRS website
- Stop the OTRS services: systemctl stop otrs or perl bin/otrs.Daemon.pl stop
- Extract the new version to the OTRS directory, overwriting existing files
- Run the upgrade script: bin/otrs.Console.pl Maint::Database::Upgrade
- Clear cache: bin/otrs.Console.pl Maint::Cache::Delete
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32740 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32740 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data