CVE-2022-32853
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out-of-bounds read issue was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in Security Update 2022-005 Catalina, macOS Big Sur 11.6.8, macOS Monterey 12.5. Processing a maliciously crafted AppleScript binary may result in unexpected termination or disclosure of process memory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in macOS AppleScript binary processing. When the system parses a maliciously crafted AppleScript binary, it reads memory beyond allocated buffer boundaries, potentially causing process termination or exposing sensitive process memory contents to an attacker.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.15.7< 10.15.7>= 11.0, < 11.6.8>= 12.0, < 12.5= 10.15.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check macOS versionRun 'sw_vers -productVersion' in Terminal to obtain the installed macOS version numberAffected if The version is 10.15.7, or falls between 11.0 and 11.6.7 inclusive, or between 12.0 and 12.4 inclusive
-
Verify AppleScript binary execution capabilityCheck if AppleScript can execute by running 'osascript -e "return 1"' in Terminal - this confirms the AppleScript interpreter is present and functionalAffected if The osascript command executes successfully, indicating AppleScript processing is available on the system
-
Identify AppleScript file processingSearch for .scpt or .applescript files on the system using 'find /Users -name "*.scpt" 2>/dev/null' or 'mdfind kMDItemFSName == "*.scpt"' to locate any compiled AppleScript filesAffected if Any .scpt files exist and can be parsed by the system, meaning the vulnerable binary parsing code path could be triggered
-
Check for automated AppleScript executionReview cron jobs, launch agents, or login items for AppleScript execution: 'crontab -l', 'ls ~/Library/LaunchAgents', 'ls /Library/LaunchAgents', and check System Preferences for login items that may run AppleScriptsAffected if Any scheduled or automated AppleScript execution exists, the malicious binary could be processed during these operations
The system is affected if it runs any vulnerable macOS version (10.15.7, 11.0-11.6.7, or 12.0-12.4) AND has the ability to process AppleScript binaries, either through manual execution, automated scripts, or embedded AppleScript content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.15.711.6.812.5
Apply Apple's security updates (Security Update 2022-005 for Catalina, macOS Big Sur 11.6.8, or macOS Monterey 12.5 or later) to all affected macOS systems to address the input validation flaw in AppleScript processing.
Security Update 2022-005 Catalina, macOS Big Sur 11.6.8, or macOS Monterey 12.5 (depending on current version)
- Identify the current macOS version by clicking the Apple menu and selecting About This Mac
- For macOS 10.15.7 (Catalina): Install Security Update 2022-005 Catalina via System Preferences > Software Update
- For macOS 11.x (Big Sur): Update to macOS Big Sur 11.6.8 via System Preferences > Software Update
- For macOS 12.x (Monterey): Update to macOS Monterey 12.5 via System Preferences > Software Update
- After updating, restart the system as prompted to apply the security patches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32853 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32853 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data