CVE-2022-33891
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Apache Spark UI offers the possibility to enable ACLs via the configuration option spark.acls.enable. With an authentication filter, this checks whether a user has access permissions to view or modify the application. If ACLs are enabled, a code path in HttpSecurityFilter can allow someone to perform impersonation by providing an arbitrary user name. A malicious user might then be able to reach a permission check function that will ultimately build a Unix shell command based on their input, and execute it. This will result in arbitrary shell command execution as the user Spark is currently running as. This affects Apache Spark versions 3.0.3 and earlier, versions 3.1.1 to 3.1.2, and versions 3.2.0 to 3.2.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Spark UI has an authentication bypass in HttpSecurityFilter where ACL enforcement can be circumvented by providing an arbitrary username, allowing user impersonation that reaches a permission check function constructing OS commands from user input, resulting in arbitrary shell command execution as the Spark service account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.0.3>= 3.1.1, <= 3.1.2>= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Spark versionRun 'spark-submit --version' or check the spark-core JAR file name in your Spark installation directory (typically under $SPARK_HOME/jars/). Compare the version number to the affected ranges: <= 3.0.3, >= 3.1.1 and <= 3.1.2, >= 3.2.0 and <= 3.2.1.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected version ranges.
-
Verify ACLs configurationCheck your Spark configuration file (spark-defaults.conf, spark-site.xml, or programmatically via SparkConf) for the property 'spark.acls.enable'. You can also run 'spark.sparkContext.getConf().get("spark.acls.enable")' in a Spark shell if you have access.Affected if spark.acls.enable is set to 'true'.
-
Confirm Spark UI is accessibleCheck if the Spark UI port (default 4040, or as configured via spark.ui.port) is exposed to network access or if the application is running in a way that allows external HTTP requests to reach the UI.Affected if The Spark UI is network-accessible from untrusted sources.
-
Check for custom filter configurationsInspect any custom security filter configurations in spark-acls or similar configuration files. Look for HttpSecurityFilter-related settings that might control authentication behavior.Affected if HttpSecurityFilter is in use and ACLs are enabled.
You are affected if you are running a vulnerable Apache Spark version (3.0.3 or earlier, 3.1.1-3.1.2, or 3.2.0-3.2.1) AND have spark.acls.enable set to true, with the Spark UI accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedIf ACLs are not required, disable spark.acls.enable configuration; otherwise upgrade to Apache Spark 3.2.2, 3.1.3, or 3.0.4 or later which contain the fix.
Apache Spark 3.2.2 (or 3.1.3, 3.0.4 depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Determine the current Apache Spark version by running: spark-submit --version or checking the Spark UI
- 2. Plan for upgrade during a maintenance window
- 3. Download Apache Spark 3.2.2 or later for Spark 3.2.x users, 3.1.3 or later for Spark 3.1.x users, or 3.0.4 or later for Spark 3.0.x users from https://spark.apache.org/downloads.html
- 4. Backup existing Spark configuration files (spark-defaults.conf, spark-env.sh)
- 5. Deploy the new Spark version to all nodes in the cluster
- 6. Verify spark.acls.enable setting in your configuration - if not explicitly needed, set it to false as a defense-in-depth measure
- 7. Restart Spark services (Spark Master, Workers, and History Server)
- 8. Validate that Spark applications run correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-33891 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-33891 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data