CVE-2023-32007
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** The Apache Spark UI offers the possibility to enable ACLs via the configuration option spark.acls.enable. With an authentication filter, this checks whether a user has access permissions to view or modify the application. If ACLs are enabled, a code path in HttpSecurityFilter can allow someone to perform impersonation by providing an arbitrary user name. A malicious user might then be able to reach a permission check function that will ultimately build a Unix shell command based on their input, and execute it. This will result in arbitrary shell command execution as the user Spark is currently running as. This issue was disclosed earlier as CVE-2022-33891, but incorrectly claimed version 3.1.3 (which has since gone EOL) would not be affected. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. Users are recommended to upgrade to a supported version of Apache Spark, such as version 3.4.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Spark UI with ACLs enabled (spark.acls.enable) has a code path in HttpSecurityFilter that allows impersonation via arbitrary username input. This input reaches a permission check function that constructs and executes a Unix shell command, leading to arbitrary command execution as the Spark user. This is a bypass/revisit of CVE-2022-33891 that was incorrectly marked as fixed in version 3.1.3.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.0.3>= 3.1.1, <= 3.1.3>= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Apache Spark versionRun 'spark-submit --version' or check the Spark version from the installation directory (e.g., ls /usr/local/spark or ls /opt/spark)Affected if The version is 3.0.3 or lower, between 3.1.1 and 3.1.3 inclusive, or between 3.2.0 and 3.2.1 inclusive
-
Verify ACL configurationCheck Spark configuration files (spark-defaults.conf, spark-env.sh) or run a Spark job with 'spark.sparkContext.getConf.get("spark.acls.enable")' and 'spark.sparkContext.getConf.get("spark.acl.enable")' to see if ACLs are enabledAffected if Either spark.acls.enable or spark.acl.enable is set to true
-
Confirm vulnerable code path is reachableCheck if the Spark UI (port 4040 by default, or configured port) is accessible. Review HTTP endpoint exposure via spark.ui.filters or security filters configurationAffected if The Spark UI is exposed to network and ACLs are enabled (both conditions must be true)
You are affected if your Spark version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND ACLs are enabled AND the Spark UI is network-accessible, which together allow arbitrary command execution through the HttpSecurityFilter impersonation flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache Spark 3.4.0 or later where this vulnerability is fixed. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, verify ACLs are disabled (spark.acl.enable=false) and ensure the Spark UI is not exposed to untrusted networks.
3.4.0
- 1. Download Apache Spark 3.4.0 or later from the official Apache Spark distribution (https://spark.apache.org/downloads.html)
- 2. Back up all existing Spark configuration files (spark-defaults.conf, spark-env.sh, etc.) and any custom applications or data
- 3. Stop all running Spark services and applications
- 4. Extract the new Spark 3.4.0 binaries to the desired installation directory
- 5. Restore or migrate the backed-up configuration files to the new installation
- 6. Verify that spark.acls.enable is properly configured if ACLs are needed, or disable ACLs if not required
- 7. Start the Spark services and verify the UI is accessible
- 8. Test that applications run correctly and the UI functions properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32007 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32007 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data