CVE-2022-33947
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn BIG-IP Versions 16.1.x before 16.1.3, 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5, and all versions of 13.1.x, a vulnerability exists in undisclosed pages of the BIG-IP DNS Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI) that allows an authenticated attacker with at least operator role privileges to cause the Tomcat process to restart and perform unauthorized DNS requests and operations through undisclosed requests. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn BIG-IP DNS TMUI, an authenticated attacker with at least operator role privileges can exploit undisclosed pages to cause Tomcat process restart and perform unauthorized DNS requests and operations. The vulnerability requires authentication and operator-level privileges, targeting the web-based management interface for DNS traffic management.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP DNS versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or access the TMUI and navigate to System > Software Management > BIG-IP Version to view the installed versionAffected if The installed version falls within 13.1.0-13.1.5, 14.1.0-14.1.4, 15.1.0-15.1.5, or 16.1.0-16.1.2
-
Verify TMUI access and operator accountsIn the TMUI, navigate to User Management > User List to review existing user accounts and their assigned rolesAffected if Any account with operator role or higher exists and can access the TMUI
-
Review Tomcat process restartsCheck system logs via 'tmsh show sys log' or the TMUI under Logs > System for Tomcat restart events, particularly from the dns moduleAffected if Unexpected or unauthorized Tomcat restarts are observed, especially those originating from DNS management pages
-
Audit DNS operations in logsReview DNS-specific logs via 'tmsh show ltm dns' or the TMUI DNS logs for unauthorized or unexpected DNS requests and zone operationsAffected if DNS operations appear that were not initiated by legitimate administrators
The environment is likely affected if the BIG-IP DNS version is within the affected ranges AND the TMUI is accessible to users with operator-level privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.1.515.1.6.116.1.3
Upgrade BIG-IP to version 16.1.3 or later, 15.1.6.1 or later, or 14.1.5 or later. Versions of 13.1.x require upgrade as they are past EoTS and receive no patches.
Upgrade to BIG-IP 16.1.3 or later, 15.1.6.1 or later, or 14.1.5 or later. Note: 13.1.x has no fix available as it is End of Technical Support (EoTS).
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP DNS TMUI version by navigating to System > Software Management > ISO Image or checking the version via TMSH: show sys version
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version: for 16.1.x upgrade to 16.1.3 or later; for 15.1.x upgrade to 15.1.6.1 or later; for 14.1.x upgrade to 14.1.5 or later; for 13.1.x note that no fix is available as this version is End of Technical Support (EoTS)
- 3. Download the appropriate hotfix ISO from the F5 Downloads portal at https://downloads.f5.com/ or from the F5 Cloud Services portal
- 4. Upload the ISO image to the BIG-IP device via the Web UI (System > Software Management > ISO Image > Import) or via TMSH: install sys software volume
- 5. Create a new boot volume for the upgrade: sys software volume create <volume-name> image <iso-image-name>
- 6. Reboot the system to boot from the new volume: sys software volume <volume-name> boot
- 7. After upgrade, verify the version is correct: tmsh show sys version | grep Version
- 8. Confirm the fix is applied by checking the security advisory status at support.f5.com for CVE-2022-33947
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-33947 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-33947 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data