Expresscluster XApplication · Nec

CVE-2022-34824

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-11-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Weak File and Folder Permissions vulnerability in CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to overwrite existing files on the file system and to potentially execute arbitrary code.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CLUSTERPRO and EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 for Windows contain weak file and folder permissions that allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to overwrite existing files on the filesystem. This can lead to arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability stems from improper NTFS permission configurations on the application directories.

MitigationCorrect NTFS file and folder permissions on the CLUSTERPRO/EXPRESSCLUSTER installation directories to follow least-privilege principles, restricting write access to only authorized system and service accounts. Verify cluster functionality after permission changes.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Expresscluster XApplication
Affected:<= 5.0
Expresscluster X SingleserversafeApplication
Affected:<= 5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Expresscluster X installation
    Locate the EXPRESSCLUSTER installation directory - typically found under C:\Program Files\NEC\EXPRESSCLUSTER or C:\Program Files (x86)\NEC\EXPRESSCLUSTER. Verify the presence of Clusterpro or Expresscluster executables and configuration files.
    Affected if The product is installed in the default or custom location on the system.
  2. Check installed version
    Open the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\NEC\EXPRESSCLUSTER or HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\NEC\EXPRESSCLUSTER and retrieve the 'Version' value, or right-click the main executable and view Properties > Details for the version number.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.0 or any version lower than 5.0.
  3. Inspect NTFS permissions on installation folder
    Right-click the main EXPRESSCLUSTER installation folder, select Properties > Security tab. Review the entries under 'Group or user names' and check the 'Write' permission column for each account.
    Affected if Any user account, non-service account, or Everyone/Users group has Write or Modify permissions granted beyond what is required for operation.
  4. Verify service account permissions
    In the Security tab of the installation folder, identify which accounts are listed as having Write access. Cross-reference these against the designated service accounts that actually run EXPRESSCLUSTER services.
    Affected if Accounts that do not correspond to authorized system or service accounts have Write or Full Control permissions on the installation directory.

A system is affected if EXPRESSCLUSTER X or Singleserversafe version 5.0 or lower is installed and the installation directories grant Write permissions to unauthorized or overly broad user groups.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.0
Interim mitigation

Correct NTFS file and folder permissions on the CLUSTERPRO/EXPRESSCLUSTER installation directories to follow least-privilege principles, restricting write access to only authorized system and service accounts. Verify cluster functionality after permission changes.

Fix this in Expresscluster X Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,440
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,104.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34824 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34824 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data