CVE-2022-34825
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Search Path Element in CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to overwrite existing files on the file system and to potentially execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in CLUSTERPRO/EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 for Windows allows remote unauthenticated attackers to overwrite existing files on the filesystem and potentially execute arbitrary code due to insecure path handling during application execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.0<= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if NEC ExpressCluster is installedCheck for ExpressCluster installation by looking for its program directories (typically under C:\Program Files\NEC\ExpressCluster\ or C:\Program Files\NEC\EXPRESSCLUSTER\) or check Windows Registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\NEC or HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\NEC for ExpressCluster entriesAffected if ExpressCluster X or ExpressCluster X Singleserversafe is found on the system
-
Determine the installed versionCheck the version of the ExpressCluster installation by examining the executable version info (clp.exe or clpw.exe in the bin folder), or query the Windows Registry key for the installed version stringAffected if The installed version is 5.0 or any version <= 5.0, as the vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 5.0
-
Verify application execution contextObserve how ExpressCluster applications are launched and whether they are run with elevated privileges. Check the service account permissions and verify if the application searches for DLLs or configuration files in user-writable locationsAffected if ExpressCluster services or applications run with elevated privileges and load resources from directories that unprivileged users can modify
-
Check for unauthorized file modificationsReview filesystem integrity by comparing current files in the ExpressCluster installation directory against known-good baselines, or use file integrity monitoring tools to detect unexpected changes to executable or configuration filesAffected if New or modified executable files, configuration files, or DLLs are found in the ExpressCluster installation directories that were not part of the original installation
A system is affected if NEC ExpressCluster X or ExpressCluster X Singleserversafe version 5.0 or lower is installed and running, particularly if the application directories are writable by lower-privileged users or if unauthorized file modifications are detected.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches/updates for the affected products; until patched, restrict filesystem permissions on application directories and monitor for unauthorized file modifications.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34825 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34825 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data