CVE-2022-40976
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA path traversal vulnerability was discovered in multiple Pilz products. An unauthenticated local attacker could use a zipped, malicious configuration file to trigger arbitrary file writes ('zip-slip'). File writes do not affect confidentiality or availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a zip-slip vulnerability in Pilz industrial automation products where a path traversal occurs during extraction of zipped configuration files. An unauthenticated local attacker can craft a malicious zip file containing paths with '..' sequences to write files to arbitrary locations outside the intended extraction directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.25.0<= 1.9.1< 1.4.0< 1.4.1< 10.14.4< 11.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Pilz industrial automation productsOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, or check C:\Program Files and C:\Program Files (x86) for Pilz directories. Look for: PAS 4000, Pascal, PASconnect, PASmotion, or Pnozmulti Configurator.Affected if Any of these Pilz products are present on the system
-
Determine installed version of PAS 4000If installed, right-click the application shortcut, select Properties, then look in the Details tab for Version info. Alternatively, check the program's Help > About dialog.Affected if Version is lower than 1.25.0
-
Determine installed version of PascalCheck application Properties > Details tab, or look in the installation directory for a version.txt or about file.Affected if Version is 1.9.1 or lower
-
Determine installed version of PASconnectCheck application Properties > Details tab or Help > About dialog.Affected if Version is lower than 1.4.0
-
Determine installed version of PASmotionCheck application Properties > Details tab or Help > About dialog.Affected if Version is lower than 1.4.1
-
Determine installed version of Pnozmulti ConfiguratorCheck application Properties > Details tab or Help > About dialog. Note that there are two version branches: 10.x and 11.x.Affected if Version is lower than 10.14.4 (for 10.x branch) or lower than 11.2.0 (for 11.x branch)
The system is affected if any Pilz product from the list is installed with a version falling within the specified vulnerable ranges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.01.4.11.25.0
Apply vendor-provided patches or firmware updates for affected Pilz products. Implement strict validation of file paths within zip archives before extraction, ensuring extracted paths resolve within the intended target directory.
Pas 4000: 1.25.0+ | Pascal: 1.9.2+ | Pasconnect: 1.4.0+ | Pasmotion: 1.4.1+ | Pnozmulti Configurator: 10.14.4+ or 11.2.0+
- 1. Identify the specific Pilz product(s) in use from the affected list: Pas 4000, Pascal, Pasconnect, Pasmotion, or Pnozmulti Configurator
- 2. Determine the current installed version of the affected product(s)
- 3. For Pas 4000: upgrade to version 1.25.0 or higher
- 4. For Pascal: upgrade to version 1.9.2 or higher
- 5. For Pasconnect: upgrade to version 1.4.0 or higher
- 6. For Pasmotion: upgrade to version 1.4.1 or higher
- 7. For Pnozmulti Configurator: upgrade to version 10.14.4 or higher, or version 11.2.0 or higher
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-40976 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-40976 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data