CVE-2022-43948
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, FortiADC version 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, FortiADC version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, FortiADC 6.2 all versions, FortiADC 6.1 all versions, FortiADC 6.0 all versions, FortiADC 5.4 all versions, FortiADC 5.3 all versions, FortiADC 5.2 all versions, FortiADC 5.1 all versions allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted arguments to existing commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in FortiWeb and FortiADC appliances. Attackers can execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted arguments to existing commands due to improper neutralization of special elements in OS command contexts. The vulnerability affects a wide range of FortiADC versions (5.1 through 7.1.1) and FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.3.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1.0, < 6.2.6>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.4>= 7.1.0, < 7.1.2>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Fortinet productAccess the appliance CLI or admin GUI and run the command to display the system hostname and model information, or check the dashboard for the product nameAffected if The product is FortiWeb or FortiADC
-
Determine the firmware versionRun the command to display the current FortiOS/FortiWeb firmware version, typically via 'get system status' or 'fnsysctl cat /etc/version' in CLIAffected if The version falls within FortiADC 5.1.0 to 6.2.5, 7.0.0 to 7.0.3, or 7.1.0 to 7.1.1; OR FortiWeb 7.0.0 to 7.0.3
-
Check admin interface network exposureReview the network configuration for the administrative interface (port1 or mgmt interface) to determine if it is bound to a wide-scope IP address or is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The admin interface is listening on 0.0.0.0 or an IP accessible from the internet or untrusted networks
-
Verify admin access restrictionsReview the administrative access settings in the web UI under System > Network > Interface, or use CLI to list admin user and trusted host configurationsAffected if No trusted host restrictions are configured for admin accounts, or the admin service is open to any source IP
The environment is affected if the device runs FortiADC version 5.1.0-6.2.5, 7.0.0-7.0.3, or 7.1.0-7.1.1, or FortiWeb version 7.0.0-7.0.3, AND the administrative interface is accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.67.0.47.1.2
Apply the vendor-supplied patches by upgrading FortiWeb to version 7.0.4 or later and FortiADC to the latest available fixed version. Until patches are applied, restrict administrative interface access to trusted networks only.
FortiADC: upgrade to 6.2.6, 7.0.4, or 7.1.2 or later branches; FortiWeb: upgrade to 7.0.4 or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiADC or FortiWeb version using the CLI command 'get system status' or through the web UI under Dashboard > Status
- 2. For FortiADC 5.1.x through 5.4.x: Upgrade to FortiADC 6.2.6 or later (6.2.x is the recommended stable branch)
- 3. For FortiADC 6.0.x through 6.2.x: Upgrade to FortiADC 6.2.6 or later
- 4. For FortiADC 7.0.x: Upgrade to FortiADC 7.0.4 or later (7.0.4 is the minimum fixed version)
- 5. For FortiADC 7.1.x: Upgrade to FortiADC 7.1.2 or later
- 6. For FortiWeb 7.0.x: Upgrade to FortiWeb 7.0.4 or later
- 7. Download the appropriate firmware from Fortinet's support portal (https://support.fortinet.com/)
- 8. Upload the firmware through the web UI (System > Firmware) or CLI using 'execute firmware upload' command
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43948 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43948 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data