CVE-2022-48601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “network print report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in ScienceLogic SL1's network print report feature where unsanitized user input is directly concatenated into SQL queries, allowing authenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary SQL commands against the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the ScienceLogic SL1 installationLocate the SL1 platform in your environment and confirm it is the affected product. Check system documentation or inventory for ScienceLogic SL1 deployment.Affected if The environment uses ScienceLogic SL1 as the monitoring/platform product
-
Determine the installed SL1 versionAccess the SL1 administration interface or check system files/About section to retrieve the exact version number installed. Compare against the affected range: <= 11.1.2Affected if The installed version is 11.1.2 or any earlier version
-
Verify access to the network print report featureDetermine whether the network print report functionality is enabled and accessible within SL1. This is typically found in the reporting or network management sections of the web interface.Affected if The network print report feature is present and accessible to authenticated users
-
Confirm authenticated access existsReview user accounts and authentication methods that have access to the network print report feature. Check for any low-privilege or compromised accounts.Affected if Any authenticated user account (including low-privilege) can access the network print report feature
-
Inspect SQL query execution pathsExamine logs, database query logs, or application traces when the network print report feature is used. Look for evidence of arbitrary SQL command execution or unexpected SQL syntax in query logs.Affected if SQL commands can be injected through user input fields in the network print report feature
You are affected if ScienceLogic SL1 version 11.1.2 or earlier is deployed and the network print report feature is accessible to authenticated users in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace direct SQL string concatenation with parameterized queries/prepared statements in the network print report feature, and implement proper input validation for all user-supplied values before using them in database queries.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-48601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-48601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data