CVE-2024-9537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedScienceLogic SL1 (formerly EM7) is affected by an unspecified vulnerability involving an unspecified third-party component packaged with SL1. The vulnerability is addressed in SL1 versions 12.1.3+, 12.2.3+, and 12.3+. Remediations have been made available for all SL1 versions back to version lines 10.1.x, 10.2.x, 11.1.x, 11.2.x, and 11.3.x.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical-severity vulnerability exists in an unspecified third-party component bundled with ScienceLogic SL1 (EM7) monitoring platform. The vulnerability has been addressed in SL1 versions 12.1.3, 12.2.3, and 12.3 and later, with vendor-provided remediations also available for older supported version branches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.1.0, < 12.1.3>= 12.2.0, < 12.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SL1 versionLocate the installed ScienceLogic SL1 version through the system administrative interface, typically found in the About or System Information section of the EM7 management console, or by running 'version' command via CLI if availableAffected if The installed version is 10.1.0 through 12.1.2 (inclusive), or 12.2.0 through 12.2.2 (inclusive)
-
Confirm third-party component presenceDetermine if the vulnerable third-party component is bundled and active on the SL1 system by reviewing the system components or bundled software list in the SL1 administrative interfaceAffected if The third-party component is present and loaded on the system
The system is affected if SL1 version falls within the ranges 10.1.0 to 12.1.2 or 12.2.0 to 12.2.2 and the vulnerable third-party component is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.1.312.2.3
Apply the appropriate vendor patch for your SL1 version line (10.1.x, 10.2.x, 11.1.x, 11.2.x, 11.3.x, or upgrade to 12.1.3+/12.2.3+/12.3+) to address the vulnerable third-party component.
12.1.3+, 12.2.3+, or 12.3+ (depending on current version branch)
- Identify current SL1 version by checking the ScienceLogic admin console or system information
- For systems on 12.1.x branch: upgrade to version 12.1.3 or later
- For systems on 12.2.x branch: upgrade to version 12.2.3 or later
- For systems on 12.3.x branch: ensure version is 12.3.0 or later
- For systems on 10.1.x, 10.2.x, 11.1.x, 11.2.x, or 11.3.x: contact ScienceLogic support for patch remediations as mentioned in official advisory
- Schedule upgrade during maintenance window due to potential service impact
- Verify upgrade completed successfully and confirm new version in admin console
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-9537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-9537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data