CVE-2022-49247
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: stk1160: If start stream fails, return buffers with VB2_BUF_STATE_QUEUED If the callback 'start_streaming' fails, then all queued buffers in the driver should be returned with state 'VB2_BUF_STATE_QUEUED'. Currently, they are returned with 'VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR' which is wrong. Fix this. This also fixes the warning: [ 65.583633] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 593 at drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:1612 vb2_start_streaming+0xd4/0x160 [videobuf2_common] [ 65.585027] Modules linked in: snd_usb_audio snd_hwdep snd_usbmidi_lib snd_rawmidi snd_soc_hdmi_codec dw_hdmi_i2s_audio saa7115 stk1160 videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common videodev mc crct10dif_ce panfrost snd_soc_simple_card snd_soc_audio_graph_card snd_soc_spdif_tx snd_soc_simple_card_utils gpu_sched phy_rockchip_pcie snd_soc_rockchip_i2s rockchipdrm analogix_dp dw_mipi_dsi dw_hdmi cec drm_kms_helper drm rtc_rk808 rockchip_saradc industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf rockchip_thermal pcie_rockchip_host ip_tables x_tables ipv6 [ 65.589383] CPU: 5 PID: 593 Comm: v4l2src0:src Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc4-62408-g32447129cb30-dirty #14 [ 65.590293] Hardware name: Radxa ROCK Pi 4B (DT) [ 65.590696] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 65.591304] pc : vb2_start_streaming+0xd4/0x160 [videobuf2_common] [ 65.591850] lr : vb2_start_streaming+0x6c/0x160 [videobuf2_common] [ 65.592395] sp : ffff800012bc3ad0 [ 65.592685] x29: ffff800012bc3ad0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800012bc3cd8 [ 65.593312] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff00000d8a7800 x24: 0000000040045612 [ 65.593938] x23: ffff800011323000 x22: ffff800012bc3cd8 x21: ffff00000908a8b0 [ 65.594562] x20: ffff00000908a8c8 x19: 00000000fffffff4 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 65.595188] x17: 000000040044ffff x16: 00400034b5503510 x15: ffff800011323f78 [ 65.595813] x14: ffff000013163886 x13: ffff000013163885 x12: 00000000000002ce [ 65.596439] x11: 0000000000000028 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : 0000000000000228 [ 65.597064] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x6 : fefefeff726c5e78 [ 65.597690] x5 : ffff800012bc3990 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff000009a34880 [ 65.598315] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff000007cd99f0 [ 65.598940] Call trace: [ 65.599155] vb2_start_streaming+0xd4/0x160 [videobuf2_common] [ 65.599672] vb2_core_streamon+0x17c/0x1a8 [videobuf2_common] [ 65.600179] vb2_streamon+0x54/0x88 [videobuf2_v4l2] [ 65.600619] vb2_ioctl_streamon+0x54/0x60 [videobuf2_v4l2] [ 65.601103] v4l_streamon+0x3c/0x50 [videodev] [ 65.601521] __video_do_ioctl+0x1a4/0x428 [videodev] [ 65.601977] video_usercopy+0x320/0x828 [videodev] [ 65.602419] video_ioctl2+0x3c/0x58 [videodev] [ 65.602830] v4l2_ioctl+0x60/0x90 [videodev] [ 65.603227] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0xe0 [ 65.603576] invoke_syscall+0x54/0x118 [ 65.603911] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0x84/0x100 [ 65.604332] do_el0_svc+0x34/0xa0 [ 65.604625] el0_svc+0x1c/0x50 [ 65.604897] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xb0 [ 65.605264] el0t_64_sync+0x16c/0x170 [ 65.605587] ---[ end trace 578e0ba07742170d ]---
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.7, < 4.14.276>= 4.15, < 4.19.238>= 4.20, < 5.4.189>= 5.5, < 5.10.110>= 5.11, < 5.15.33>= 5.16, < 5.16.19>= 5.17, < 5.17.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.14.2764.19.2385.4.189
Linux kernel >= 5.10.110 (or >= 5.4.189, >= 4.19.238, or >= 4.14.276 depending on branch)
- Identify the current Linux kernel version using `uname -r`
- Determine which kernel branch you're running (e.g., 4.14.x, 4.19.x, 5.4.x, or 5.10.x)
- Upgrade the kernel to a version that includes the fix: for 4.14.x upgrade to >= 4.14.276, for 4.19.x upgrade to >= 4.19.238, for 5.4.x upgrade to >= 5.4.189, or for 5.10.x upgrade to >= 5.10.110
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel
- Verify the fix is present by checking the stk1160 driver code in drivers/media/usb/stk1160/ or by running the affected workload without triggering the warning
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-49247 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-49247 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data