Linux KernelOperating system · Linux

CVE-2022-49248

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.9.311 / 4.14.276 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: firewire-lib: fix uninitialized flag for AV/C deferred transaction AV/C deferred transaction was supported at a commit 00a7bb81c20f ("ALSA: firewire-lib: Add support for deferred transaction") while 'deferrable' flag can be uninitialized for non-control/notify AV/C transactions. UBSAN reports it: kernel: ================================================================================ kernel: UBSAN: invalid-load in /build/linux-aa0B4d/linux-5.15.0/sound/firewire/fcp.c:363:9 kernel: load of value 158 is not a valid value for type '_Bool' kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 182227 Comm: irq/35-firewire Tainted: P OE 5.15.0-18-generic #18-Ubuntu kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. AX370-Gaming 5/AX370-Gaming 5, BIOS F42b 08/01/2019 kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <IRQ> kernel: show_stack+0x52/0x58 kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x5f kernel: dump_stack+0x10/0x12 kernel: ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x45 kernel: __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value.cold+0x44/0x49 kernel: fcp_response.part.0.cold+0x1a/0x2b [snd_firewire_lib] kernel: fcp_response+0x28/0x30 [snd_firewire_lib] kernel: fw_core_handle_request+0x230/0x3d0 [firewire_core] kernel: handle_ar_packet+0x1d9/0x200 [firewire_ohci] kernel: ? handle_ar_packet+0x1d9/0x200 [firewire_ohci] kernel: ? transmit_complete_callback+0x9f/0x120 [firewire_core] kernel: ar_context_tasklet+0xa8/0x2e0 [firewire_ohci] kernel: tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xea/0xf0 kernel: tasklet_action+0x22/0x30 kernel: __do_softirq+0xd9/0x2e3 kernel: ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.0+0xf0/0xf0 kernel: do_softirq+0x75/0xa0 kernel: </IRQ> kernel: <TASK> kernel: __local_bh_enable_ip+0x50/0x60 kernel: irq_forced_thread_fn+0x7e/0x90 kernel: irq_thread+0xba/0x190 kernel: ? irq_thread_fn+0x60/0x60 kernel: kthread+0x11e/0x140 kernel: ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xf0/0xf0 kernel: ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 kernel: ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 kernel: </TASK> kernel: ================================================================================ This commit fixes the bug. The bug has no disadvantage for the non- control/notify AV/C transactions since the flag has an effect for AV/C response with INTERIM (0x0f) status which is not used for the transactions in AV/C general specification.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis
How this class of weakness works · CWE-908

Memory or a resource is used before it has been initialised, so its contents are whatever happened to be there — sometimes leaking earlier data, sometimes values an attacker can influence. Behaviour becomes unpredictable and occasionally exploitable. Remediation is initialising every resource before use and ensuring initialisation happens on all code paths.

General guidance for the use of uninitialized resource class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:>= 3.16, < 4.9.311>= 4.10, < 4.14.276>= 4.15, < 4.19.238>= 4.20, < 5.4.189>= 5.5, < 5.10.110>= 5.11, < 5.15.33>= 5.16, < 5.16.19>= 5.17, < 5.17.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.9.311 / 4.14.276 / 4.19.238 or later
Fixed in 4.9.3114.14.2764.19.238
Vendor patch git.kernel.org →
Recommended fix High confidence

Kernel 4.9.311+, 4.14.276+, 4.19.238+, or 5.4.189+ (or any later stable kernel)

  1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
  2. Check which kernel version branch your current kernel belongs to (e.g., 4.9.x, 4.14.x, 4.19.x, or 5.4.x)
  3. Upgrade to a kernel version that includes the fix: for 4.9.x series use >=4.9.311, for 4.14.x use >=4.14.276, for 4.19.x use >=4.19.238, for 5.4.x use >=5.4.189
  4. On Debian/Ubuntu: `sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install linux-image-<version>` and reboot
  5. On RHEL/CentOS: `sudo yum update kernel` and reboot
  6. On Fedora: `sudo dnf update kernel` and reboot
  7. Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version after reboot with `uname -r`
Caveat Kernel upgrades may require driver/module recompilation and could introduce compatibility changes with third-party kernel modules

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-49248 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-49248 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data