Linux KernelOperating system · Linux

CVE-2022-49378

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.10.122 / 5.15.47 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sfc: fix considering that all channels have TX queues Normally, all channels have RX and TX queues, but this is not true if modparam efx_separate_tx_channels=1 is used. In that cases, some channels only have RX queues and others only TX queues (or more preciselly, they have them allocated, but not initialized). Fix efx_channel_has_tx_queues to return the correct value for this case too. Messages shown at probe time before the fix: sfc 0000:03:00.0 ens6f0np0: MC command 0x82 inlen 544 failed rc=-22 (raw=0) arg=0 ------------[ cut here ]------------ netdevice: ens6f0np0: failed to initialise TXQ -1 WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 626 at drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c:2393 efx_ef10_tx_init+0x201/0x300 [sfc] [...] stripped RIP: 0010:efx_ef10_tx_init+0x201/0x300 [sfc] [...] stripped Call Trace: efx_init_tx_queue+0xaa/0xf0 [sfc] efx_start_channels+0x49/0x120 [sfc] efx_start_all+0x1f8/0x430 [sfc] efx_net_open+0x5a/0xe0 [sfc] __dev_open+0xd0/0x190 __dev_change_flags+0x1b3/0x220 dev_change_flags+0x21/0x60 [...] stripped Messages shown at remove time before the fix: sfc 0000:03:00.0 ens6f0np0: failed to flush 10 queues sfc 0000:03:00.0 ens6f0np0: failed to flush queues

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:>= 5.5.1, < 5.10.122>= 5.11, < 5.15.47>= 5.16, < 5.17.15>= 5.18, < 5.18.4= 5.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.10.122 / 5.15.47 / 5.17.15 or later
Fixed in 5.10.1225.15.475.17.15
Vendor patch git.kernel.org →
Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to kernel version 5.10.122, 5.15.47, 5.17.15, or 5.18.4 (or later stable) depending on which branch you are on

  1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
  2. Determine which version range the current kernel falls into from the affected versions: >= 5.5.1/<5.10.122, >=5.11/<5.15.47, >=5.16/<5.17.15, or >=5.18/<5.18.4
  3. Upgrade the Linux kernel to the corresponding fixed release: 5.10.122, 5.15.47, 5.17.15, or 5.18.4 respectively (or a later stable release)
  4. Reboot the system to load the new kernel
  5. Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version with `uname -r`
Caveat Kernel upgrades may require driver recompilation for out-of-tree modules; ensure all dependent kernel modules are compatible with the target kernel version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-49378 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-49378 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data