CVE-2022-49424
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/mediatek: Fix NULL pointer dereference when printing dev_name When larbdev is NULL (in the case I hit, the node is incorrectly set iommus = <&iommu NUM>), it will cause device_link_add() fail and kernel crashes when we try to print dev_name(larbdev). Let's fail the probe if a larbdev is NULL to avoid invalid inputs from dts. It should work for normal correct setting and avoid the crash caused by my incorrect setting. Error log: [ 18.189042][ T301] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000050 ... [ 18.344519][ T301] pstate: a0400005 (NzCv daif +PAN -UAO) [ 18.345213][ T301] pc : mtk_iommu_probe_device+0xf8/0x118 [mtk_iommu] [ 18.346050][ T301] lr : mtk_iommu_probe_device+0xd0/0x118 [mtk_iommu] [ 18.346884][ T301] sp : ffffffc00a5635e0 [ 18.347392][ T301] x29: ffffffc00a5635e0 x28: ffffffd44a46c1d8 [ 18.348156][ T301] x27: ffffff80c39a8000 x26: ffffffd44a80cc38 [ 18.348917][ T301] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffffffd44a80cc38 [ 18.349677][ T301] x23: ffffffd44e4da4c6 x22: ffffffd44a80cc38 [ 18.350438][ T301] x21: ffffff80cecd1880 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 18.351198][ T301] x19: ffffff80c439f010 x18: ffffffc00a50d0c0 [ 18.351959][ T301] x17: ffffffffffffffff x16: 0000000000000004 [ 18.352719][ T301] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: ffffffd44eb5d420 [ 18.353480][ T301] x13: 0000000000000ad2 x12: 0000000000000003 [ 18.354241][ T301] x11: 00000000fffffad2 x10: c0000000fffffad2 [ 18.355003][ T301] x9 : a0d288d8d7142d00 x8 : a0d288d8d7142d00 [ 18.355763][ T301] x7 : ffffffd44c2bc640 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 18.356524][ T301] x5 : 0000000000000080 x4 : 0000000000000001 [ 18.357284][ T301] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000005 [ 18.358045][ T301] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 18.360208][ T301] Hardware name: MT6873 (DT) [ 18.360771][ T301] Call trace: [ 18.361168][ T301] dump_backtrace+0xf8/0x1f0 [ 18.361737][ T301] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0x11c [ 18.362305][ T301] dump_stack+0x1c/0x2c [ 18.362816][ T301] mrdump_common_die+0x184/0x40c [mrdump] [ 18.363575][ T301] ipanic_die+0x24/0x38 [mrdump] [ 18.364230][ T301] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x128/0x2b8 [ 18.364937][ T301] die+0x16c/0x568 [ 18.365394][ T301] __do_kernel_fault+0x1e8/0x214 [ 18.365402][ T301] do_page_fault+0xb8/0x678 [ 18.366934][ T301] do_translation_fault+0x48/0x64 [ 18.368645][ T301] do_mem_abort+0x68/0x148 [ 18.368652][ T301] el1_abort+0x40/0x64 [ 18.368660][ T301] el1h_64_sync_handler+0x54/0x88 [ 18.368668][ T301] el1h_64_sync+0x68/0x6c [ 18.368673][ T301] mtk_iommu_probe_device+0xf8/0x118 [mtk_iommu] ...
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisThe code follows a pointer that is null, crashing the process. An attacker who can reliably trigger it turns the crash into a denial of service. The fix is checking for null before use and handling the failure path gracefully.
General guidance for the null pointer dereference class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.15.33, < 5.15.46>= 5.16.19, < 5.17>= 5.17.2, < 5.17.14>= 5.18, < 5.18.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.15.465.175.17.14
Upgrade to Linux kernel 5.15.46+ (for 5.15.x branch), 5.17.14+ (for 5.17.x branch), or 5.18.3+ (for 5.18.x branch). Alternatively, any stable kernel 5.19+ includes the fix.
- 1. Identify the current kernel version by running `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version`
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on your current kernel branch (5.15.x, 5.16.x, 5.17.x, or 5.18.x)
- 3. For systems running 5.15.x (>=5.15.33): upgrade to kernel version 5.15.46 or later
- 4. For systems running 5.16.x or 5.17.x: upgrade to kernel version 5.17.14 or later
- 5. For systems running 5.18.x: upgrade to kernel version 5.18.3 or later
- 6. Alternatively, upgrade to any stable kernel version released after the affected versions (e.g., 5.19.x or later)
- 7. After kernel upgrade, verify the fix is present by checking that `mtk_iommu_probe_device` no longer dereferences a NULL larbdev without validation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-49424 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-49424 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data