CVE-2022-50053
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iavf: Fix reset error handling Do not call iavf_close in iavf_reset_task error handling. Doing so can lead to double call of napi_disable, which can lead to deadlock there. Removing VF would lead to iavf_remove task being stuck, because it requires crit_lock, which is held by iavf_close. Call iavf_disable_vf if reset fail, so that driver will clean up remaining invalid resources. During rapid VF resets, HW can fail to setup VF mailbox. Wrong error handling can lead to iavf_remove being stuck with: [ 5218.999087] iavf 0000:82:01.0: Failed to init adminq: -53 ... [ 5267.189211] INFO: task repro.sh:11219 blocked for more than 30 seconds. [ 5267.189520] Tainted: G S E 5.18.0-04958-ga54ce3703613-dirty #1 [ 5267.189764] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 5267.190062] task:repro.sh state:D stack: 0 pid:11219 ppid: 8162 flags:0x00000000 [ 5267.190347] Call Trace: [ 5267.190647] <TASK> [ 5267.190927] __schedule+0x460/0x9f0 [ 5267.191264] schedule+0x44/0xb0 [ 5267.191563] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x14/0x20 [ 5267.191890] __mutex_lock.isra.12+0x6e3/0xac0 [ 5267.192237] ? iavf_remove+0xf9/0x6c0 [iavf] [ 5267.192565] iavf_remove+0x12a/0x6c0 [iavf] [ 5267.192911] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 5267.193285] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0 [ 5267.193619] device_release_driver_internal+0xc1/0x150 [ 5267.193974] pci_stop_bus_device+0x69/0x90 [ 5267.194361] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20 [ 5267.194735] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xba/0x120 [ 5267.195130] sriov_disable+0x2f/0xe0 [ 5267.195506] ice_free_vfs+0x7d/0x2f0 [ice] [ 5267.196056] ? pci_get_device+0x4f/0x70 [ 5267.196496] ice_sriov_configure+0x78/0x1a0 [ice] [ 5267.196995] sriov_numvfs_store+0xfe/0x140 [ 5267.197466] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12e/0x1c0 [ 5267.197918] new_sync_write+0x10c/0x190 [ 5267.198404] vfs_write+0x24e/0x2d0 [ 5267.198886] ksys_write+0x5c/0xd0 [ 5267.199367] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 5267.199827] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 5267.200317] RIP: 0033:0x7f5b381205c8 [ 5267.200814] RSP: 002b:00007fff8c7e8c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 5267.201981] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f5b381205c8 [ 5267.202620] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00005569420ee900 RDI: 0000000000000001 [ 5267.203426] RBP: 00005569420ee900 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5b38180820 [ 5267.204327] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f5b383c06e0 [ 5267.205193] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007f5b383bb880 R15: 0000000000000002 [ 5267.206041] </TASK> [ 5267.206970] Kernel panic - not syncing: hung_task: blocked tasks [ 5267.207809] CPU: 48 PID: 551 Comm: khungtaskd Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S E 5.18.0-04958-ga54ce3703613-dirty #1 [ 5267.208726] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.11.0 11/02/2019 [ 5267.209623] Call Trace: [ 5267.210569] <TASK> [ 5267.211480] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 5267.212472] panic+0x107/0x294 [ 5267.213467] watchdog.cold.8+0xc/0xbb [ 5267.214413] ? proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs+0x30/0x30 [ 5267.215511] kthread+0xf4/0x120 [ 5267.216459] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 5267.217505] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 5267.218459] </TASK>
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisShared resources are accessed without correct locking, so concurrent operations interleave into inconsistent — and sometimes exploitable — states, or deadlock the service outright. These bugs are subtle and timing-dependent. The fix is correct, consistent locking or atomic operations around every shared resource.
General guidance for the improper locking class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.14, < 5.15.63>= 5.16, < 5.19.4= 6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.15.635.19.4
Linux Kernel 5.15.63+, 5.19.4+, or 6.1+ (depending on branch in use)
- Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 5.15.63 or later if using the 5.15 LTS branch
- Upgrade to version 5.19.4 or later if using the 5.16-5.19 development branch
- Upgrade to version 6.1 or later if using the 6.0 branch or newer
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-50053 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-50053 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data