dbcve.org
Linux KernelOperating system · Linux

CVE-2022-50089

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.15.61 / 5.18.18 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: ensure pages are unlocked on cow_file_range() failure There is a hung_task report on zoned btrfs like below. https://github.com/naota/linux/issues/59 [726.328648] INFO: task rocksdb:high0:11085 blocked for more than 241 seconds. [726.329839] Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1+ #1 [726.330484] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [726.331603] task:rocksdb:high0 state:D stack: 0 pid:11085 ppid: 11082 flags:0x00000000 [726.331608] Call Trace: [726.331611] <TASK> [726.331614] __schedule+0x2e5/0x9d0 [726.331622] schedule+0x58/0xd0 [726.331626] io_schedule+0x3f/0x70 [726.331629] __folio_lock+0x125/0x200 [726.331634] ? find_get_entries+0x1bc/0x240 [726.331638] ? filemap_invalidate_unlock_two+0x40/0x40 [726.331642] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x5b2/0x770 [726.331649] truncate_inode_pages_final+0x44/0x50 [726.331653] btrfs_evict_inode+0x67/0x480 [726.331658] evict+0xd0/0x180 [726.331661] iput+0x13f/0x200 [726.331664] do_unlinkat+0x1c0/0x2b0 [726.331668] __x64_sys_unlink+0x23/0x30 [726.331670] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [726.331674] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [726.331677] RIP: 0033:0x7fb9490a171b [726.331681] RSP: 002b:00007fb943ffac68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000057 [726.331684] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb9490a171b [726.331686] RDX: 00007fb943ffb040 RSI: 000055a6bbe6ec20 RDI: 00007fb94400d300 [726.331687] RBP: 00007fb943ffad00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [726.331688] R10: 0000000000000031 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fb943ffb000 [726.331690] R13: 00007fb943ffb040 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fb943ffd260 [726.331693] </TASK> While we debug the issue, we found running fstests generic/551 on 5GB non-zoned null_blk device in the emulated zoned mode also had a similar hung issue. Also, we can reproduce the same symptom with an error injected cow_file_range() setup. The hang occurs when cow_file_range() fails in the middle of allocation. cow_file_range() called from do_allocation_zoned() can split the give region ([start, end]) for allocation depending on current block group usages. When btrfs can allocate bytes for one part of the split regions but fails for the other region (e.g. because of -ENOSPC), we return the error leaving the pages in the succeeded regions locked. Technically, this occurs only when @unlock == 0. Otherwise, we unlock the pages in an allocated region after creating an ordered extent. Considering the callers of cow_file_range(unlock=0) won't write out the pages, we can unlock the pages on error exit from cow_file_range(). So, we can ensure all the pages except @locked_page are unlocked on error case. In summary, cow_file_range now behaves like this: - page_started == 1 (return value) - All the pages are unlocked. IO is started. - unlock == 1 - All the pages except @locked_page are unlocked in any case - unlock == 0 - On success, all the pages are locked for writing out them - On failure, all the pages except @locked_page are unlocked

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:>= 5.12, < 5.15.61>= 5.16, < 5.18.18>= 5.19, < 5.19.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.15.61 / 5.18.18 / 5.19.2 or later
Fixed in 5.15.615.18.185.19.2
Vendor patch git.kernel.org →
Recommended fix High confidence

5.15.61, 5.18.18, or 5.19.2 (or later stable releases)

  1. Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 5.15.61 or later if running a 5.15.x kernel
  2. Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 5.18.18 or later if running a 5.16.x or 5.18.x kernel
  3. Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 5.19.2 or later if running a 5.19.x kernel
Caveat Kernel upgrades may require system reboot and could introduce regressions in other filesystem functionality; test in staging first

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-50089 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-50089 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data