CVE-2022-50319
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: coresight: trbe: remove cpuhp instance node before remove cpuhp state cpuhp_state_add_instance() and cpuhp_state_remove_instance() should be used in pairs. Or there will lead to the warn on cpuhp_remove_multi_state() since the cpuhp_step list is not empty. The following is the error log with 'rmmod coresight-trbe': Error: Removing state 215 which has instances left. Call trace: __cpuhp_remove_state_cpuslocked+0x144/0x160 __cpuhp_remove_state+0xac/0x100 arm_trbe_device_remove+0x2c/0x60 [coresight_trbe] platform_remove+0x34/0x70 device_remove+0x54/0x90 device_release_driver_internal+0x1e4/0x250 driver_detach+0x5c/0xb0 bus_remove_driver+0x64/0xc0 driver_unregister+0x3c/0x70 platform_driver_unregister+0x20/0x30 arm_trbe_exit+0x1c/0x658 [coresight_trbe] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1ac/0x24c invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x58/0x1a0 do_el0_svc+0x38/0xd0 el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1ac/0x1b0 el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.13, < 5.15.86>= 5.16, < 6.0.16>= 6.1, < 6.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.15.866.0.166.1.2
5.15.86, 6.0.16, or 6.1.2 (depending on the major version branch in use)
- Identify the currently running kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Check if the running kernel version is affected: >= 5.13 and < 5.15.86, or >= 5.16 and < 6.0.16, or >= 6.1 and < 6.1.2
- If affected, update the kernel package to a fixed version: upgrade to 5.15.86 or later, 6.0.16 or later, or 6.1.2 or later
- Reboot the system to load the fixed kernel
- Verify the fix by running 'uname -r' to confirm the new version is loaded and by checking that 'rmmod coresight-trbe' no longer produces the cpuhp warning
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-50319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-50319 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data