CVE-2022-50483
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: enetc: avoid buffer leaks on xdp_do_redirect() failure Before enetc_clean_rx_ring_xdp() calls xdp_do_redirect(), each software BD in the RX ring between index orig_i and i can have one of 2 refcount values on its page. We are the owner of the current buffer that is being processed, so the refcount will be at least 1. If the current owner of the buffer at the diametrically opposed index in the RX ring (i.o.w, the other half of this page) has not yet called kfree(), this page's refcount could even be 2. enetc_page_reusable() in enetc_flip_rx_buff() tests for the page refcount against 1, and [ if it's 2 ] does not attempt to reuse it. But if enetc_flip_rx_buff() is put after the xdp_do_redirect() call, the page refcount can have one of 3 values. It can also be 0, if there is no owner of the other page half, and xdp_do_redirect() for this buffer ran so far that it triggered a flush of the devmap/cpumap bulk queue, and the consumers of those bulk queues also freed the buffer, all by the time xdp_do_redirect() returns the execution back to enetc. This is the reason why enetc_flip_rx_buff() is called before xdp_do_redirect(), but there is a big flaw with that reasoning: enetc_flip_rx_buff() will set rx_swbd->page = NULL on both sides of the enetc_page_reusable() branch, and if xdp_do_redirect() returns an error, we call enetc_xdp_free(), which does not deal gracefully with that. In fact, what happens is quite special. The page refcounts start as 1. enetc_flip_rx_buff() figures they're reusable, transfers these rx_swbd->page pointers to a different rx_swbd in enetc_reuse_page(), and bumps the refcount to 2. When xdp_do_redirect() later returns an error, we call the no-op enetc_xdp_free(), but we still haven't lost the reference to that page. A copy of it is still at rx_ring->next_to_alloc, but that has refcount 2 (and there are no concurrent owners of it in flight, to drop the refcount). What really kills the system is when we'll flip the rx_swbd->page the second time around. With an updated refcount of 2, the page will not be reusable and we'll really leak it. Then enetc_new_page() will have to allocate more pages, which will then eventually leak again on further errors from xdp_do_redirect(). The problem, summarized, is that we zeroize rx_swbd->page before we're completely done with it, and this makes it impossible for the error path to do something with it. Since the packet is potentially multi-buffer and therefore the rx_swbd->page is potentially an array, manual passing of the old pointers between enetc_flip_rx_buff() and enetc_xdp_free() is a bit difficult. For the sake of going with a simple solution, we accept the possibility of racing with xdp_do_redirect(), and we move the flip procedure to execute only on the redirect success path. By racing, I mean that the page may be deemed as not reusable by enetc (having a refcount of 0), but there will be no leak in that case, either. Once we accept that, we have something better to do with buffers on XDP_REDIRECT failure. Since we haven't performed half-page flipping yet, we won't, either (and this way, we can avoid enetc_xdp_free() completely, which gives the entire page to the slab allocator). Instead, we'll call enetc_xdp_drop(), which will recycle this half of the buffer back to the RX ring.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.13, < 5.15.86>= 5.16, < 6.0.16>= 6.1, < 6.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.15.866.0.166.1.2
5.15.86+ / 6.0.16+ / 6.1.2+ (choose the appropriate branch for your deployment)
- Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 5.15.86 or later if using the 5.15.x stable branch
- Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 6.0.16 or later if using the 6.0.x stable branch
- Upgrade the Linux kernel to version 6.1.2 or later if using the 6.1.x stable branch
- Alternatively, apply the vendor patch commit 306526331e7a37e714e11ab7c6d73eb004745224 to your kernel source
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-50483 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-50483 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data