CVE-2023-0264
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Keycloaks OpenID Connect user authentication, which may incorrectly authenticate requests. An authenticated attacker who could obtain information from a user request within the same realm could use that data to impersonate the victim and generate new session tokens. This issue could impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceKeycloak's OpenID Connect implementation contains a session impersonation flaw where an authenticated attacker within the same realm who obtains certain information from a user request can impersonate the victim and generate new session tokens, enabling unauthorized access to the victim's sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 18.0.6< 7.6.2all versions= 4.9= 4.10= 4.9= 4.10= 4.9= 4.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Keycloak or RH SSO installation and versionCheck the installed version of Keycloak or Red Hat Single Sign-On. For Keycloak, run: 'keycloak --version' or check the pom.xml/build.gradle if source available. For RH SSO, check via RPM: 'rpm -qi rh-sso7-keycloak' or check the server version via admin console at /auth/realms/master/. Look for the version number in the response.Affected if The installed version is below 18.0.6 for Keycloak, or below 7.6.2 for Red Hat Single Sign-On (all versions of RH SSO prior to 7.6.2 are affected).
-
Identify OpenShift Container Platform with integrated KeycloakIf Keycloak is deployed on OCP, check the OCP version by running: 'oc get clusterversion' or 'oc version'. Identify any Keycloak pods in the cluster using: 'oc get pods -A | grep -i keycloak' or check for the Keycloak operator.Affected if OCP versions 4.9 or 4.10 are running with Keycloak integrated for authentication.
-
Verify OpenID Connect realm is configuredAccess the Keycloak/RH SSO admin console and navigate to the Realm Settings or examine the realm configuration files (typically in /opt/keycloak/standalone/data/keycloakdb/ or the database). Check if OpenID Connect (OIDC) adapters or clients are configured for any realm.Affected if OpenID Connect realms or clients are configured and active, enabling the attack surface for session impersonation.
-
Review active user sessions for anomaliesIn the Keycloak/RH SSO admin console, go to Sessions under the Realm or specific client. Check for any sessions created in short succession, sessions with unusual client IPs, or sessions that the user does not recognize. Alternatively, query session tables in the underlying database for duplicate or overlapping session IDs.Affected if Unexpected or unauthorized sessions exist that were not initiated by legitimate users, indicating potential exploitation.
Your environment is affected if you are running any Keycloak version below 18.0.6, any RH SSO version below 7.6.2, or OCP versions 4.9 or 4.10 with integrated Keycloak, and you have OpenID Connect realms configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.6.218.0.6
Upgrade Keycloak to the patched version and review/rotate existing sessions to ensure compromised sessions are invalidated.
Keycloak 18.0.6 or RH-SSO 7.6.2
- Upgrade Keycloak to version 18.0.6 or later
- If using Red Hat Single Sign-On (RH-SSO), upgrade to version 7.6.2 or later
- For OpenShift Container Platform deployments, apply the corresponding Red Hat security advisory patches for OCP 4.9 and 4.10 once available via your OCP cluster management tools
- After upgrading, verify that existing user sessions are still valid and consider invalidating potentially compromised sessions if there is evidence of exploitation
- Test the authentication flow thoroughly to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-0264 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-0264 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data