CVE-2023-0400
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe protection bypass vulnerability in DLP for Windows 11.9.x is addressed in version 11.10.0. This allowed a local user to bypass DLP controls when uploading sensitive data from a mapped drive into a web email client. Loading from a local driver was correctly prevented. Versions prior to 11.9 correctly detected and blocked the attempted upload of sensitive data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDLP for Windows version 11.9.x contained a protection bypass vulnerability where sensitive data uploaded from mapped drives to web email clients was not detected or blocked, while uploads from local drives were correctly prevented. This represented a regression from earlier versions (prior to 11.9) that properly blocked both scenarios.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.9.0, < 11.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed DLP versionCheck the installed version of Trellix Data Loss Prevention for Windows through the product UI, registry, or installed programs list. Compare it to the affected range: 11.9.0 through any version less than 11.10.0.Affected if The installed version is 11.9.x (any minor version) or falls within 11.9.0 <= version < 11.10.0
-
Confirm mapped drive usageReview the environment to determine if users have mapped network drives configured. Check if any network locations are mapped as drive letters (e.g., M:, Z:) that could contain sensitive data.Affected if Mapped drives are present in the environment and users can access files through them
-
Verify web email client accessDetermine if users have access to web-based email clients (such as Outlook Web Access, Gmail, Yahoo Mail) from the protected endpoints.Affected if Web email clients are accessible from the endpoints where DLP is deployed
-
Test upload behavior from mapped drivesAttempt to upload a test file containing sensitive content (such as a fake credit card number or mock SSN) from a mapped drive to a web email client. Observe whether DLP blocks or detects the upload.Affected if The upload from the mapped drive to the web email client completes without DLP intervention, while the same upload from a local drive would be blocked
The environment is affected if DLP for Windows version 11.9.x is installed AND mapped drives are present AND users can access web email clients, as uploads from mapped drives to web email will bypass DLP protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.10.0
Upgrade DLP for Windows to version 11.10.0 or later to restore proper scanning of mapped drive content during web email uploads.
11.10.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current Data Loss Prevention (DLP) version installed on Windows systems by checking the Trellix agent or DLP console.
- 2. Confirm the installed version is >= 11.9.0 and < 11.10.0, which confirms exposure to CVE-2023-0400.
- 3. Plan the upgrade during a maintenance window, ensuring proper backups and rollback procedures are in place.
- 4. Upgrade DLP for Windows to version 11.10.0 or later using the Trellix upgrade mechanism (e.g., via ePolicy Orchestrator or manual installer).
- 5. After upgrade, verify the DLP version now shows 11.10.0 or higher.
- 6. Test the fix by attempting to upload sensitive data from a mapped drive to a web email client - it should now be correctly blocked.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-0400 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-0400 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data