CVE-2023-0507
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGrafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Starting with the 8.1 branch, Grafana had a stored XSS vulnerability affecting the core plugin GeoMap. The stored XSS vulnerability was possible due to map attributions weren't properly sanitized and allowed arbitrary JavaScript to be executed in the context of the currently authorized user of the Grafana instance. An attacker needs to have the Editor role in order to change a panel to include a map attribution containing JavaScript. This means that vertical privilege escalation is possible, where a user with Editor role can change to a known password for a user having Admin role if the user with Admin role executes malicious JavaScript viewing a dashboard. Users may upgrade to version 8.5.21, 9.2.13 and 9.3.8 to receive a fix.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGrafana versions 8.1+ contain a stored XSS vulnerability in the GeoMap plugin where map attributions are not properly sanitized, allowing execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the authenticated user viewing the dashboard.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.1.0, < 8.5.21>= 9.2.0, < 9.2.13>= 9.3.0, < 9.3.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Grafana versionRun `grafana-server -v` or check the version through the UI at Server Admin > Stats or via API: `curl -s http://localhost:3000/api/health`Affected if Version is 8.1.0 through 8.5.20, 9.2.0 through 9.2.12, or 9.3.0 through 9.3.7 (not fixed versions 8.5.21, 9.2.13, 9.3.8 or later)
-
Verify GeoMap plugin is presentCheck plugin directory for geo folder or query the Grafana plugins API: `curl -s http://localhost:3000/api/plugins | grep -i geomap`Affected if GeoMap plugin is installed and enabled in the Grafana instance
-
Identify dashboards using GeoMap panelsQuery the dashboards API: `curl -s http://localhost:3000/api/search?type=dash-db` then inspect each dashboard JSON for panels of type "geomap"Affected if Dashboards contain GeoMap panel configurations where malicious attribution strings could be stored
-
Inspect GeoMap panel attribution configurationOpen each dashboard with GeoMap panels, edit the panel, expand the Map section, and review the Attribution field for unsanitized HTML or JavaScriptAffected if The Attribution field contains script tags, event handlers (onclick, onerror, etc.), or other potentially malicious HTML/JavaScript content that renders when viewing the dashboard
A user is affected if running a vulnerable Grafana version AND the GeoMap plugin is installed with dashboards containing GeoMap panels that have malicious script content in the Attribution field.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.219.2.139.3.8
Upgrade Grafana to version 8.5.21, 9.2.13, or 9.3.8 or later. Until then, restrict Editor role permissions and disable or restrict the GeoMap panel plugin.
Upgrade to Grafana 8.5.21 (if on 8.x branch), 9.2.13 (if on 9.2.x branch), or 9.3.8 (if on 9.3.x branch)
- Identify your current Grafana version by checking the Grafana UI (Configuration > About) or running `grafana-server --version`
- Determine which upgrade path applies based on your current version: if on 8.x, upgrade to 8.5.21; if on 9.2.x, upgrade to 9.2.13; if on 9.3.x, upgrade to 9.3.8
- Back up your Grafana configuration (grafana.ini) and data directory before upgrading
- Upgrade Grafana using your package manager (e.g., `apt-get update && apt-get install grafana` for Debian/Ubuntu, or `yum update grafana` for RHEL/CentOS), or by downloading the appropriate package from grafana.com
- Restart the Grafana service after upgrade completes (e.g., `systemctl restart grafana-server`)
- Verify the new version is running and the GeoMap panel attribution field now properly sanitizes input
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-0507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-0507 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data