CVE-2023-0594
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGrafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Starting with the 7.0 branch, Grafana had a stored XSS vulnerability in the trace view visualization. The stored XSS vulnerability was possible due the value of a span's attributes/resources were not properly sanitized and this will be rendered when the span's attributes/resources are expanded. An attacker needs to have the Editor role in order to change the value of a trace view visualization to contain JavaScript. This means that vertical privilege escalation is possible, where a user with Editor role can change to a known password for a user having Admin role if the user with Admin role executes malicious JavaScript viewing a dashboard. Users may upgrade to version 8.5.21, 9.2.13 and 9.3.8 to receive a fix.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Grafana's trace view visualization where span attributes/resources are not properly sanitized, allowing injection of malicious JavaScript. An authenticated user with Editor role can inject JavaScript that executes when an Admin user views the affected trace view, enabling vertical privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 8.5.21>= 9.2.0, < 9.2.13>= 9.3.0, < 9.3.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Grafana versionRun 'grafana-server -v' or 'grafana-cli --version', or inspect the UI at Help > About. If running as a container, check the image tag. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: 7.0.0 to 8.5.20, 9.2.0 to 9.2.12, or 9.3.0 to 9.3.7.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the three affected ranges (7.0.0-8.5.20, 9.2.0-9.2.12, or 9.3.0-9.3.7).
-
Verify tracing or Tempo data source is configuredNavigate to Configuration > Data Sources in the Grafana UI, or query the data sources API endpoint. Look for Grafana Tempo, Jaeger, Zipkin, or other tracing data sources.Affected if A tracing data source (Tempo, Jaeger, Zipkin) is configured and active.
-
Confirm trace view functionality is in useCheck Grafana explore view or dashboards for any panels or links that open trace visualization. Inspect recent query logs or access logs for '/api/v3/traces/' or similar trace viewer endpoints.Affected if Users have accessed trace view visualizations within the timeframe the vulnerability could be exploited.
-
Review user role assignmentsQuery the Grafana user API or inspect Organization > Users to identify users with Editor and Admin roles. The attack requires an Editor to inject and an Admin to trigger the XSS.Affected if Both Editor role and Admin role users exist in the Grafana instance.
You are affected if your Grafana version is within the affected ranges AND you have a tracing data source configured with trace view accessible to both Editor and Admin role users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.219.2.139.3.8
Upgrade Grafana to version 8.5.21, 9.2.13, or 9.3.8 to receive the fix. Alternatively, implement input validation on span attributes before rendering.
8.5.21, 9.2.13, or 9.3.8 (depending on your current major version branch)
- Identify your current Grafana version by checking the grafana-server version or configuration
- If running version 7.0.0 to 7.x, upgrade to 8.5.21 (or preferably to a newer 8.x LTS release)
- If running version 9.2.0 to 9.2.x, upgrade to 9.2.13
- If running version 9.3.0 to 9.3.x, upgrade to 9.3.8
- After upgrading, verify the trace view visualization functionality works correctly
- Ensure the Grafana service is restarted after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-0594 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-0594 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data