CVE-2023-0629
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDocker Desktop before 4.17.0 allows an unprivileged user to bypass Enhanced Container Isolation (ECI) restrictions by setting the Docker host to docker.raw.sock, or npipe:////.pipe/docker_engine_linux on Windows, via the -H (--host) CLI flag or the DOCKER_HOST environment variable and launch containers without the additional hardening features provided by ECI. This would not affect already running containers, nor containers launched through the usual approach (without Docker's raw socket). The affected functionality is available for Docker Business customers only and assumes an environment where users are not granted local root or Administrator privileges. This issue has been fixed in Docker Desktop 4.17.0. Affected Docker Desktop versions: from 4.13.0 before 4.17.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDocker Desktop before 4.17.0 contains a flaw where unprivileged users can bypass Enhanced Container Isolation (ECI) by setting the Docker host to docker.raw.sock (Linux) or npipe:////.pipe/docker_engine_linux (Windows) via the -H CLI flag or DOCKER_HOST environment variable, allowing containers to be launched without ECI hardening features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.13.0, < 4.17.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Docker Desktop versionRun 'docker --version' or open Docker Desktop and navigate to About Docker Desktop to view the version numberAffected if Version is 4.13.0, 4.14.x, 4.15.x, or 4.16.x (any version >= 4.13.0 and < 4.17.0)
-
Verify Enhanced Container Isolation is enabledOpen Docker Desktop settings, go to Settings > General, and check if 'Enable Enhanced Container Isolation' is toggled onAffected if ECI is enabled in Docker Desktop settings
-
Check DOCKER_HOST environment variableOpen a terminal and run 'echo $DOCKER_HOST' (Linux/macOS) or 'echo %DOCKER_HOST%' (Windows) to see if the environment variable is setAffected if DOCKER_HOST is set to 'docker.raw.sock' (Linux) or 'npipe:////.pipe/docker_engine_linux' (Windows)
-
Inspect command history for -H flag usageSearch shell history or review scripts/docker-compose files for commands using 'docker -H docker.raw.sock' or 'docker -H npipe:////.pipe/docker_engine_linux'Affected if The -H CLI flag is used with the raw socket paths to connect directly to the Docker daemon
-
Audit scheduled tasks and startup configurationsReview any scheduled tasks, systemd services, or startup scripts that may invoke Docker with the raw socket path bypassAffected if Any automated processes are configured to use the raw socket method instead of the default ECI-hardened connection
You are affected if Docker Desktop version is between 4.13.0 and 4.16.x inclusive, Enhanced Container Isolation is enabled, AND the raw socket path (docker.raw.sock or npipe:////.pipe/docker_engine_linux) is used via DOCKER_HOST or -H flag to bypass ECI hardening.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.17.0
Upgrade Docker Desktop to version 4.17.0 or later. Additionally, audit any containers launched using the raw socket method to ensure they were not used to circumvent ECI controls.
Docker Desktop 4.17.0
- Check the current Docker Desktop version by clicking the Docker icon in the system tray and selecting 'About Docker Desktop'
- Navigate to the Docker Desktop downloads page at docs.docker.com/desktop/release-notes
- Download Docker Desktop version 4.17.0 or later
- Run the installer and follow the on-screen prompts to upgrade
- Restart Docker Desktop after the upgrade completes
- Verify the version by checking 'About Docker Desktop' to confirm version 4.17.0 or higher is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-0629 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-0629 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data