CVE-2023-0683
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA valid, authenticated XCC user with read only access may gain elevated privileges through a specifically crafted API call.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability exists where an authenticated user with read-only access to XCC can gain elevated privileges through a specifically crafted API call, bypassing intended authorization controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.93_afbt30p< 2.93_afbt30p< 2.93_afbt30p< 3.72_tei388s< 3.72_tei388s< 8.88_cdi3a4a< 8.88_cdi3a4a< 2.93_afbt30pCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Thinkagile modelAccess the Lenovo XClarity Controller (XCC) web interface or use IPMI/Redfish to query the system hardware information. Look for the specific model name such as Hx5530, Hx7530, Vx3331, Hx1021, Hx1320, Hx1321, Hx1331, or the enclosure type.Affected if The model is one of the affected Thinkagile products listed in the CVE (Hx5530, Hx7530, Vx3331, Hx Enclosure, Hx1021, Hx1320, Hx1321, or Hx1331).
-
Check the XCC firmware versionIn the XCC web interface, navigate to the Firmware Update or BMC Settings section to view the current firmware version. Alternatively, use IPMI command: 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <XCC_IP> -U <user> -P <pass> raw' or Redfish GET request to /api/settings to retrieve the firmware version string.Affected if The installed firmware version is lower than the threshold for your model (Hx5530/Hx7530/Vx3331/Hx1331: < 2.93_afbt30p, Hx Enclosure/Hx1021: < 3.72_tei388s, Hx1320/Hx1321: < 8.88_cdi3a4a).
-
Verify XCC authentication is enabledConfirm that XCC user authentication is active by attempting to log in with valid credentials or checking the security settings in the XCC web interface under User Administration or Access Settings.Affected if XCC is accessible and accepts authentication, meaning the vulnerability can be exploited by an authenticated user.
-
Identify read-only user accountsIn the XCC interface, review the User Administration section to enumerate accounts and their permission levels. Look for accounts with read-only or restricted roles assigned.Affected if There exists at least one user account with read-only or limited privileges, as this is the prerequisite for exploiting the privilege escalation flaw.
You are affected if you are running a Thinkagile model listed in the CVE with an XCC firmware version below the specified threshold, and you have read-only user accounts configured in XCC.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.93_afbt30p3.72_tei388s8.88_cdi3a4a
Apply vendor-supplied patches or updates for XCC. Review and restrict API permissions for read-only accounts until the patch is deployed.
Firmware 2.93_afbt30p (Hx5530, Hx7530, Vx3331, Hx1331), 3.72_tei388s (Hx Enclosure, Hx1021), or 8.88_cdi3a4a (Hx1320, Hx1321)
- 1. Identify the specific ThinkAgile model in your environment from the affected products list
- 2. Navigate to Lenovo Support (support.lenovo.com) and locate the firmware download page for your specific model
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed firmware version: 2.93_afbt30p for Hx5530, Hx7530, Vx3331, Hx1331; 3.72_tei388s for Hx Enclosure, Hx1021; 8.88_cdi3a4a for Hx1320, Hx1321
- 4. Review the firmware update instructions provided by Lenovo for your specific hardware
- 5. Apply the firmware update following Lenovo's standard XCC firmware update procedure
- 6. After update, verify the XCC firmware version matches the fixed release
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by testing that read-only users cannot escalate privileges via API calls
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-0683 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-0683 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data