CVE-2023-1032
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Linux kernel io_uring IORING_OP_SOCKET operation contained a double free in function __sys_socket_file() in file net/socket.c. This issue was introduced in da214a475f8bd1d3e9e7a19ddfeb4d1617551bab and fixed in 649c15c7691e9b13cbe9bf6c65c365350e056067.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Linux kernel io_uring IORING_OP_SOCKET operation contains a double-free vulnerability in the __sys_socket_file() function in net/socket.c. This memory corruption issue allows a local attacker to potentially cause denial of service or escalate privileges through repeated exploitation of the double-free condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.19, < 6.3= 6.3= 22.04= 22.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to identify the kernel versionAffected if The version is 5.19.x, 6.0.x, 6.1.x, 6.2.x, or exactly 6.3.x (these fall within >= 5.19 and < 6.3 or equal 6.3)
-
Verify io_uring is availableCheck for the io_uring interface by looking for /dev/io_uring or run 'lsmod | grep io_uring' to see if the module is loadedAffected if io_uring is present and loadable on the system, making the vulnerable code path reachable
-
Confirm socket support in io_uringCheck if the kernel was compiled with CONFIG_IO_URING and CONFIG_NET (run 'grep -E "CONFIG_IO_URING|CONFIG_NET" /boot/config-$(uname -r)' or check /proc/config.gz if available)Affected if Both CONFIG_IO_URING and CONFIG_NET are enabled, which exposes the __sys_socket_file() function through io_uring syscalls
-
Monitor for IORING_OP_SOCKET usageReview application code or system audit logs for usage of io_uring_setup with IORING_OP_SOCKET, or use 'strace' to trace io_uring_enter calls mentioning socket operationsAffected if Applications are actively using io_uring to perform socket operations, which directly triggers the vulnerable __sys_socket_file() code path
The system is affected if it runs a kernel version 5.19 through 6.3 inclusive AND has io_uring with socket operations enabled or in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.3
Apply the kernel patch from commit 649c15c7691e9b13cbe9bf6c65c365350e056067 or update to a kernel version containing this fix. Organizations using io_uring with socket operations should prioritize this update given the memory corruption potential.
Linux Kernel >= 6.4; Ubuntu 22.04 HWE kernel >= 5.15.0-104; Ubuntu 22.10 kernel >= 5.19.0-50
- 1. Identify the current running kernel version using 'uname -r'
- 2. For Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy), upgrade to a kernel version that includes the fix. Ubuntu kernel versions are typically prefixed with '5.15.0-xx' or similar. Check for available kernel updates via 'apt update && apt-cache policy linux-image-generic'
- 3. For Ubuntu 22.10 (Kinetic), upgrade to a kernel version that includes the fix. Check available kernels via 'apt update && apt-cache policy linux-image-generic'
- 4. Install the updated kernel package: 'sudo apt-get install linux-image-<version>'
- 5. Reboot the system to load the new kernel: 'sudo reboot'
- 6. Verify the new kernel is running and the vulnerability is addressed by checking the kernel version matches a fixed release (Linux kernel >= 6.4 or Ubuntu kernel with patch applied)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1032 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1032 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data