CVE-2023-1980
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTwo factor authentication bypass on login in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.35 and earlier allow user to cancel the two factor authentication via the application user interface and open entries.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability allows authenticated users to bypass two-factor authentication in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2022.3.35 and earlier by canceling the 2FA prompt through the application UI, thereby gaining unauthorized access to stored entries without completing the second authentication factor.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2022.3.35CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of Remote Desktop ManagerOpen the application, go to Help > About, or check the installed program version through Windows Programs and Features. Compare the version number to the affected range <= 2022.3.35Affected if The installed version is 2022.3.35 or earlier (any version up to and including 2022.3.35)
-
Verify 2FA is configured for the applicationCheck the application security settings to confirm if two-factor authentication is enabled. This is typically found in the application settings under Security or Authentication options.Affected if 2FA is enabled and the version is within the affected range, making the bypass vulnerability applicable
-
Confirm the 2FA prompt can be canceledDuring a login attempt where 2FA is required, attempt to cancel or close the 2FA prompt through the UI rather than completing the second factorAffected if The 2FA prompt can be dismissed or canceled, allowing access to stored entries without completing the second authentication factor
A user is affected if they are running Remote Desktop Manager version 2022.3.35 or earlier and have 2FA enabled, as the application allows bypassing the second factor by canceling the authentication prompt.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager to a version newer than 2022.3.35 to obtain the vendor patch that enforces proper 2FA completion before granting access to entries.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-1980 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-1980 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data