CVE-2023-20023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in specific Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) CLI commands could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform command injection attacks on the underlying operating system and elevate privileges to root. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must have valid Administrator privileges on the affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by submitting a crafted CLI command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple command injection vulnerabilities exist in specific Cisco ISE CLI commands that fail to properly validate user-supplied input. An authenticated attacker with Administrator privileges can submit crafted CLI commands to execute arbitrary operating system commands with root privileges on the underlying Linux system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco ISE is presentCheck for Cisco ISE installation by running 'show version' in the CLI or logging into the ISE Admin web interface and navigating to Administration > System > Settings > Server Certificate to confirm the productAffected if Cisco Identity Services Engine software is not installed on the system
-
Determine the installed Cisco ISE versionIn the ISE CLI, run the command 'show version' and locate the version number in the output. Alternatively, log into the ISE Admin portal and go to Administration > System > Deployment to view the versionAffected if The installed version is exactly 3.2 (CVE lists = 3.2 as affected)
-
Verify Administrator CLI access existsIn the ISE Admin portal, navigate to Administration > System > Admin Access > Administrators > Admin Users and review which admin users have CLI access permissions enabled. Alternatively, use 'show running-config | include admin' in the CLIAffected if Any Administrator-level user account has CLI access enabled and the account credentials could be obtained by an attacker
-
Check for recent suspicious CLI activityReview ISE CLI command history logs and system logs for unexpected or crafted commands. Run 'show logins last 24 hours' and check system logs for unusual command execution patternsAffected if There is evidence of unexpected CLI commands or command injection attempts in the logs
You are affected if Cisco ISE version 3.2 is installed AND an attacker could obtain Administrator-level credentials with CLI access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant Cisco ISE software update when available; until then, restrict Administrator access to only trusted personnel and monitor CLI command usage for suspicious activity.
Cisco ISE 3.2 with relevant patch or Cisco ISE 3.3+ (contact Cisco for exact fixed version)
- 1. Log into the Cisco ISE administrator web interface or access CLI as Administrator.
- 2. Navigate to the Administration > System > Backup & Restore page to ensure you have a current backup of your ISE configuration.
- 3. Contact Cisco Technical Support or check the Cisco ISE security advisory at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for the specific patch for CVE-2023-20023.
- 4. Apply the relevant patches for Cisco ISE version 3.2 or upgrade to a fixed release as specified in the advisory.
- 5. After upgrade, verify that Administrator CLI commands execute normally and confirm the vulnerability is remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data