CVE-2023-20031
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the SSL/TLS certificate handling of Snort 3 Detection Engine integration with Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 detection engine to restart. This vulnerability is due to a logic error that occurs when an SSL/TLS certificate that is under load is accessed when it is initiating an SSL connection. Under specific, time-based constraints, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high rate of SSL/TLS connection requests to be inspected by the Snort 3 detection engine on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the Snort 3 detection engine to reload, resulting in either a bypass or a denial of service (DoS) condition, depending on device configuration. The Snort detection engine will restart automatically. No manual intervention is required.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic error in the Snort 3 detection engine's SSL/TLS certificate handling within Cisco Firepower Threat Defense causes the engine to restart when certificates are accessed during SSL connection initiation under specific time-based constraints. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger this by sending a high rate of SSL/TLS connection requests to be inspected, resulting in either traffic bypass or denial of service depending on device configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.7.0= 6.7.0.1= 6.7.0.2= 6.7.0.3= 7.0.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.1= 7.0.1.1= 7.0.2= 7.0.2.1= 7.0.3= 7.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FTD software versionRun 'show version' or check the FTD management interface to determine the installed Cisco Firepower Threat Defense version.Affected if The installed version matches one of these: 6.7.0, 6.7.0.1, 6.7.0.2, 6.7.0.3, 7.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.1, 7.0.1.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.2.1, 7.0.3, or 7.0.4.
-
Confirm Snort 3 detection engine is activeAccess FTD CLI and run 'show snort3' or check the intrusion policy settings to verify Snort 3 is the active detection engine.Affected if Snort 3 is the active detection engine in use on the device.
-
Verify SSL/TLS inspection is enabledReview the access control policy or intrusion policy configuration via FTD management interface or CLI to determine if SSL/TLS inspection rules are active.Affected if SSL/TLS inspection or decryption policies are configured and applied to traffic.
-
Check for Snort engine restart eventsReview system logs, audit logs, or run 'show snort3 statistics' to identify recent Snort engine reloads or restarts that correlate with high SSL/TLS traffic periods.Affected if Snort engine restarts or reloads are occurring without other known causes.
Environment is affected if running an affected FTD version with Snort 3 active and SSL/TLS inspection enabled, especially if unexplained Snort restarts are observed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided patches for Cisco FTD software. In the interim, evaluate device configuration to minimize bypass impact if Snort reloads occur, and consider rate limiting SSL/TLS traffic where feasible to reduce exploit feasibility.
Secure Firewall Threat Defense 6.7.0.4 or later (or 6.8.0+)
- 1. Identify current Secure Firewall Threat Defense version using 'show version' command
- 2. Verify the device is running an affected version (6.7.0, 6.7.0.1, 6.7.0.2, or 6.7.0.3)
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade operation
- 4. Download the fixed FTD software image from Cisco (version 6.7.0.4 or later, or 6.8.0+)
- 5. Upload the new image to the device using 'upgrade' or FMC interface
- 6. Install the upgrade and verify the Snort 3 engine loads successfully
- 7. Confirm the new version is running with 'show version'
- 8. Verify Snort 3 inspection is operational with 'show module snort'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20031 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20031 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data