CVE-2023-20048
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web services interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute certain unauthorized configuration commands on a Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) device that is managed by the FMC Software. This vulnerability is due to insufficient authorization of configuration commands that are sent through the web service interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the FMC web services interface and sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute certain configuration commands on the targeted FTD device. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid credentials on the FMC Software.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in Cisco FMC's web services interface allows an authenticated attacker with valid credentials to send crafted HTTP requests that bypass authorization checks, enabling execution of unauthorized configuration commands on managed FTD devices. The root cause is insufficient authorization validation for configuration commands transmitted through the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.2.3, <= 6.2.3.18>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.0.16>= 6.6.0, <= 6.6.7.1>= 6.7.0, <= 6.7.0.3>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.5>= 7.1.0, <= 7.1.0.3>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.3.1>= 7.3.0, <= 7.3.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco FMC installationAccess the FMC web interface and check the System > Troubleshooting > General page, or log into the FMC CLI and run 'show version' to confirm Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is installed.Affected if The system is running Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center.
-
Determine FMC versionIn the FMC web UI, navigate to System > About to view the exact version number. From CLI, run 'show version | include Version' or 'sudo grep -i version /etc/neoespejo_version' if available.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 6.2.3 to 6.2.3.18, 6.4.0 to 6.4.0.16, 6.6.0 to 6.6.7.1, 7.0.0 to 7.0.5, 7.1.0 to 7.1.0.3, 7.2.0 to 7.2.3.1, or 7.3.0 to 7.3.1.1.
-
Verify web services interface accessConfirm the FMC web services interface is reachable by accessing the FMC URL over HTTPS. Check if external or untrusted users have network access to port 443 on the FMC management interface.Affected if The web interface is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.
-
Review FMC audit logs for unauthorized commandsIn the FMC web UI, navigate to System > Audit Log and examine entries for configuration commands on managed FTD devices. Look for commands initiated by users who should not have authorization for those actions.Affected if Audit logs show configuration commands executed by users without proper role-based access control permissions.
-
Inspect managed FTD devices for unexpected changesLog into managed Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) devices via CLI or FMC and compare current running configuration against known-good baselines. Check for unauthorized access policies, NAT rules, or routing changes.Affected if FTD devices show configuration changes that were not initiated by authorized administrators through proper channels.
You are affected if Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is running a version within the listed ranges AND the web services interface is accessible, with potential indicators in audit logs or FTD configurations showing unauthorized command execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict access to the FMC web services interface to trusted users only, enforce strong credential policies, and apply Cisco's available patches. Monitor for unauthorized configuration changes on managed FTD devices.
Cisco FMC 6.2.3.19+, 6.4.0.17+, 6.6.7.2+, 6.7.0.4+ (or migrate to 6.8.x/7.0+ for longer support)
- 1. Identify the currently installed FMC version using the web interface (System > Updates) or CLI (show version)
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version (6.2.3.x -> 6.4.0.x or later, 6.4.0.x -> 6.6.0.x or later, etc.)
- 3. Back up the FMC configuration via System > Updates > Backup/Restore
- 4. Download the corresponding FMC upgrade package from Cisco Software Downloads (sec.cloudapps.cisco.com)
- 5. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require brief downtime
- 6. Upload the upgrade package via FMC web interface: System > Updates > Product Updates
- 7. Install the update and allow the system to reboot
- 8. Verify the upgrade completed successfully and the version matches the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20048 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20048 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data