CVE-2025-20265
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the RADIUS subsystem implementation of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands that are executed by the device. This vulnerability is due to a lack of proper handling of user input during the authentication phase. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted input when entering credentials that will be authenticated at the configured RADIUS server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute commands at a high privilege level. Note: For this vulnerability to be exploited, Cisco Secure FMC Software must be configured for RADIUS authentication for the web-based management interface, SSH management, or both.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the RADIUS authentication subsystem of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center. Attackers can inject arbitrary shell commands through crafted credential input during RADIUS authentication. Since authentication processing runs with high privilege, successful exploitation grants the attacker root-level command execution on the FMC device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.7= 7.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the FMC versionLog into the FMC CLI and run 'show version' or access the web interface under System > Troubleshooting > General > Software Version to view the installed software versionAffected if The installed version is exactly 7.0.7 or 7.7.0
-
Check RADIUS authentication statusIn the FMC web interface, navigate to System > Authentication to view the authentication configuration, or use the CLI command 'show running-config aaa' to see which authentication methods are enabledAffected if RADIUS authentication is enabled for any management interface (web or SSH)
-
Verify RADIUS server configurationAccess the RADIUS server objects via the web interface at Object > AAA Servers > RADIUS to see if any RADIUS servers are defined and configuredAffected if One or more RADIUS servers are configured and active for authentication
You are affected if your FMC runs version 7.0.7 or 7.7.0 AND has RADIUS authentication enabled for web or SSH management access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable RADIUS authentication for web and SSH management interfaces until Cisco releases an official patch. Alternatively, use local authentication as an interim measure.
Contact Cisco TAC for the fixed release (likely 7.0.8, 7.7.1 or later)
- 1. Verify current FMC version by logging into the web interface or running 'show version' via SSH
- 2. Confirm RADIUS authentication is enabled by navigating to System > Users > User Management > RADIUS in the FMC web interface
- 3. Contact Cisco TAC or check Cisco Security Advisory cisco-sa-fmc-radius-cmdinj for the specific fixed software version
- 4. Download the fixed FMC software version from Cisco Software Download Center (software.cisco.com)
- 5. Plan maintenance window - schedule during low-traffic period as FMC will be temporarily unavailable during upgrade
- 6. Back up FMC configuration via System > Tools > Backup/Restore before upgrading
- 7. Upgrade FMC to the fixed version following Cisco upgrade guide documentation
- 8. After upgrade, verify RADIUS authentication still functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20265 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20265 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data