CVE-2023-20111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information. This vulnerability is due to the improper storage of sensitive information within the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to the web-based management interface and viewing hidden fields within the application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access sensitive information, including device entry credentials, that could aid the attacker in further attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco ISE stores sensitive information like device credentials in hidden fields within its web-based management interface. An authenticated attacker with valid login credentials can view these hidden fields to access plaintext credentials or other sensitive data that should not be exposed to the application user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.6.0= 2.7.0= 3.0.0= 3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco ISE installed versionLog into the ISE admin CLI or access Administration > System > Settings > Product Version in the web UI to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if Version is 2.6.0 or lower, 2.7.0, 3.0.0, or 3.1
-
Confirm web management interface is enabledVerify the ISE web-based management interface is accessible on port 443 or 8080Affected if The web management interface is exposed and reachable
-
Review administrator accounts for unauthorized accessCheck Administration > Identity Management > Identities > Users in the ISE web UI for any unexpected admin accounts or recent credential changesAffected if Unknown or unauthorized administrator accounts exist in the system
-
Audit access to credential storage pagesReview ISE admin logs and session records for queries to pages that expose device credentials or sensitive hidden fieldsAffected if Unusual or unauthorized queries to credential storage interfaces are present in logs
A system is affected if it runs Cisco ISE versions 2.6.0 or lower, 2.7.0, 3.0.0, or 3.1 AND the web management interface is accessible to users who should not view hidden credential data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch from Cisco when available. In the interim, restrict administrative access to the ISE web interface to trusted personnel only and monitor for unauthorized account usage.
Cisco ISE 3.2 or later
- 1. Back up the Cisco ISE configuration before starting the upgrade process
- 2. Review Cisco ISE upgrade documentation and ensure compatibility with your current deployment
- 3. Download Cisco ISE version 3.2 or later from the Cisco Software Download page
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require downtime
- 5. Upload the upgrade bundle to the Cisco ISE primary node
- 6. Initiate the upgrade through the ISE CLI or admin GUI
- 7. Wait for the upgrade to complete and verify all services are running
- 8. Verify the vulnerability is resolved by checking that sensitive information is no longer visible in hidden fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data