CVE-2023-20142
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, and RV325 Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient input validation by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device and then persuading a user to visit specific web pages that include malicious payloads. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple XSS vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV series routers (RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, RV325) allow unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted HTTP requests. Successful exploitation requires tricking a user into visiting a page that triggers the injected payload, enabling execution of arbitrary script code in the context of the web interface or exfiltration of sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify router modelAccess the router web interface or check the device label/menu to confirm the exact model number (RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, or RV325)Affected if The model is any of RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, or RV325 and the web interface is accessible
-
Confirm firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to Status or System Summary page to view the installed firmware versionAffected if Any firmware version is installed (all versions are affected)
-
Check web management interface accessibilityAttempt to access the router web interface over HTTP/HTTPS from a test system using the router IP addressAffected if The web interface responds and is reachable on the network
-
Verify remote management configurationIn the router web interface, go to Administration > Remote Management or similar section to see if remote access is enabledAffected if Remote web management is enabled and the interface is accessible from untrusted networks
-
Assess network exposureReview firewall rules or network ACLs to determine if the router web management port (typically 80/443) is exposed to the internet or untrusted networksAffected if The web management interface is reachable from outside trusted networks
If the router is any of the affected RV series models and its web management interface is accessible from the network (especially if remote management is enabled), the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2023-20142 XSS attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince Cisco has not released patches, implement compensating controls: restrict web management interface access to trusted networks or localhost only, disable remote web management if not required, and educate users about avoiding malicious links. Consider network segmentation or router replacement if exposure is unavoidable.
- Cisco has not released software updates to address these vulnerabilities.
- Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface to trusted networks only.
- Restrict access to the web-based management interface using firewall rules or ACLs.
- Monitor for suspicious HTTP requests targeting the affected devices.
- Educate users about the risks of clicking untrusted links, though this does not mitigate the underlying vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20142 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20142 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data