CVE-2023-20193
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Embedded Service Router (ESR) of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, local attacker to read, write, or delete arbitrary files on the underlying operating system and escalate their privileges to root. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have valid Administrator-level privileges on the affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper privilege management in the ESR console. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate their privileges to root and read, write, or delete arbitrary files from the underlying operating system of the affected device. Note: The ESR is not enabled by default and must be licensed. To verify the status of the ESR in the Admin GUI, choose Administration > Settings > Protocols > IPSec.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco ISE's Embedded Service Router (ESR) that allows an authenticated Administrator-level attacker to gain root access and read, write, or delete arbitrary files on the underlying OS. The vulnerability stems from improper privilege management in the ESR console, exploited via crafted requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.7>= 3.0, <= 3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco ISE versionRun 'show version' in the ISE CLI or check the Administration > System > Settings > About page in the ISE web interface to obtain the exact version numberAffected if The installed version is 2.7 or earlier, or falls between 3.0 and 3.3 inclusive
-
Verify if ESR is enabledCheck the ESR configuration via CLI using 'show running-config | include esr' or through the ISE web interface under Administration > System > Settings > ESRAffected if The ESR feature is currently enabled on the system
-
Review Administrator account accessAudit the list of users with Administrator privileges in ISE under Administration > Identity Management > Identities > UsersAffected if There are Administrator accounts configured (exploitation requires authenticated Administrator-level access to ISE)
The system is affected if Cisco ISE is running a vulnerable version (2.7 or earlier, or 3.0-3.3) AND the ESR feature is enabled, allowing an authenticated Administrator to potentially escalate privileges to root.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable the ESR if not required (it is not enabled by default), apply Cisco patches when available, and restrict Administrator access to trusted personnel only.
Cisco ISE version 3.4 or later (or the corresponding patched 2.7.x release if staying on 2.x branch)
- 1. Verify the current Cisco ISE version by navigating to Administration > System > Licensing > About Cisco ISE in the Admin GUI
- 2. Check if the Embedded Service Router (ESR) is enabled by going to Administration > Settings > Protocols > IPSec
- 3. If ESR is enabled, disable it as a temporary mitigation by going to Administration > Settings > Protocols > IPSec and toggling ESR off
- 4. Access the Cisco Software Download portal at software.cisco.com and navigate to Cisco ISE releases
- 5. Download and upgrade to Cisco ISE version 3.4 or later (the first fixed release for this vulnerability)
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version in Administration > System > Licensing > About Cisco ISE
- 7. Re-enable ESR if needed after confirming the upgrade was successful
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20193 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20193 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data