CVE-2023-20224
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent, Virtual Appliance installation type, could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges to root on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of user-supplied CLI arguments. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to an affected device and using crafted commands at the prompt. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root. The attacker must have valid credentials on the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance. An authenticated attacker with valid device credentials can inject arbitrary commands through insufficiently validated CLI arguments, bypassing normal permission boundaries to execute code with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.230CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent installationIdentify whether the Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance is installed on the system by looking for the product binaries, services, or documentation files typical of this appliance.Affected if the appliance software is present on the system
-
Determine installed versionUse the appropriate command or method to retrieve the installed version of the Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent. Compare this version against the affected range of versions prior to 0.230.Affected if the installed version is lower than 0.230
-
Verify CLI access configurationInspect the CLI configuration and accessibility settings to determine whether remote or local CLI access is enabled and how authentication is configured.Affected if CLI access is enabled and uses authentication mechanisms that could be leveraged by an authenticated attacker
-
Review CLI command loggingExamine CLI audit logs, command history, or execution logs for any unusual or unauthorized commands that may indicate exploitation attempts, particularly commands running with elevated privileges.Affected if unexpected or suspicious CLI commands are found in logs, especially those suggesting privilege escalation
A user is affected if Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance is installed with a version lower than 0.230 and the CLI interface is accessible to authenticated attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.230
Apply the vendor patch from Cisco when available. Until then, limit CLI access to only trusted administrators with valid credentials and implement command execution monitoring to detect exploitation attempts.
0.230 or later
- 1. Back up the current ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent configuration and data.
- 2. Verify current installed version using 'te-agent --version' or through the agent's web interface.
- 3. Download the ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent version 0.230 or later from the official Cisco/ThousandEyes download portal.
- 4. Stop the ThousandEyes agent service using 'sudo systemctl stop te-agent' or equivalent service command.
- 5. Install the upgraded agent package using the appropriate package manager for the Virtual Appliance (e.g., dpkg, rpm, or the provided installer script).
- 6. Verify the installation completed successfully.
- 7. Start the ThousandEyes agent service using 'sudo systemctl start te-agent' or equivalent.
- 8. Confirm the new version is running using 'te-agent --version'.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20224 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data