CVE-2024-20277
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent, Virtual Appliance installation type, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a command injection and elevate privileges to root. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for the web interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP packet to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands and elevate privileges to root.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthenticated command injection vulnerability in Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance web-based management interface. Insufficient validation of user-supplied input allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary commands and escalate privileges to root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.233.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent versionAccess the Virtual Appliance web management interface and navigate to the version information page, typically found under Settings > System > About, or run the command 'te-agent --version' if CLI access is availableAffected if The displayed version number is less than 0.233.2 (for example, 0.233.1, 0.232.0, etc.)
-
Confirm the product is ThousandEyes Virtual ApplianceVerify the device is running Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance by checking the web UI header or login page for ThousandEyes branding, or check the system hostname and service nameAffected if The product is ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance and version is below 0.233.2
-
Verify the web-based management interface is enabledCheck if the web management interface (typically on port 443 or 4433) is listening and accessible on the appliance. This can be done by checking open ports with 'netstat -tlnp' or attempting to reach the interface via browserAffected if The web-based management interface is enabled and accessible on the network
-
Check for existing administrator accountsReview the list of configured users in the ThousandEyes web interface under Settings > Users and Accounts to determine if weak or default credentials may existAffected if Any user account with administrative privileges exists in the system (the vulnerability requires authenticated access)
The environment is affected if the Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance is running a version lower than 0.233.2 and the web-based management interface is accessible with valid credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.233.2
Apply vendor-provided patches for Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent. Restrict network access to the management interface and enforce strong authentication credentials.
0.233.2
- 1. Identify all ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent Virtual Appliance installations in your environment
- 2. Check the current installed version by accessing the appliance management interface or running: te-agent --version
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 4. Download the ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent version 0.233.2 or later from the Cisco ThousandEyes portal
- 5. Follow Cisco's standard upgrade procedure for the Virtual Appliance: access the management interface, navigate to Settings > System > Upgrade, and upload the new image
- 6. After upgrade completes, verify the version is 0.233.2 or higher using: te-agent --version
- 7. Confirm the web-based management interface is functional and test that authenticated sessions work properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20277 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20277 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data