CVE-2023-20235
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the on-device application development workflow feature for the Cisco IOx application hosting infrastructure in Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to access the underlying operating system as the root user. This vulnerability exists because Docker containers with the privileged runtime option are not blocked when they are in application development mode. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using the Docker CLI to access an affected device. The application development workflow is meant to be used only on development systems and not in production systems.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE IOx application hosting infrastructure's on-device application development workflow allows authenticated remote attackers to gain root access to the underlying OS. The issue stems from Docker containers with privileged runtime option not being blocked during application development mode, enabling container escape via Docker CLI.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 17.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the IOS XE versionRun 'show version' or 'show version | include IOS' to display the installed IOS XE version numberAffected if The version is earlier than 17.3.1 (e.g., 17.2.x, 17.1.x, 16.x releases)
-
Verify if IOx is enabledRun 'show iox' or 'show iox-service' to check if the IOx application hosting infrastructure is active on the deviceAffected if IOx is enabled and running (the 'IOx' service shows as 'Enabled' or 'Active')
-
Confirm application development mode statusCheck the IOx configuration with 'show running-config | include iox' or 'show iox-app-hosting' to see if development-related features are configuredAffected if Application development mode or the IOx app-hosting feature is enabled on the system
-
Assess network exposureReview device access control lists, management interface configurations, and whether the device management IP is exposed to untrusted networksAffected if The device management or IOx interfaces are reachable from networks accessible to unauthenticated or low-privilege attackers
The system is affected if it runs IOS XE version < 17.3.1 with IOx application hosting enabled and exposed to network access, allowing an authenticated attacker to leverage the development workflow for container escape.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.3.1
Disable the application development workflow feature in production environments. If development features are required, isolate affected systems from production networks and implement additional access controls. Cisco explicitly states this feature should only be used on development systems, not production.
IOS XE 17.3.1 or later
- Confirm current IOS XE version using 'show version' command
- Download IOS XE 17.3.1 or later from Cisco.com or Cisco Software Central
- Review Cisco upgrade documentation for your specific hardware platform
- Perform firmware upgrade following standard Cisco IOS XE upgrade procedures
- After upgrade, verify the IOx application hosting infrastructure is updated and the vulnerability is patched
- If IOx application development mode is not needed in production, disable it using the 'iox' configuration commands
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-20235 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-20235 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data