CVE-2023-24847
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTransient DOS in Modem while allocating DSM items.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA transient denial of service vulnerability in cellular modem firmware where DSM (Data Services Module) item allocation can cause the modem to become unresponsive or crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the cellular modem modelCheck the device documentation, hardware label, or use AT commands (e.g., AT+CGMM, AT+CGMI) to query the modem for its model identifierAffected if The modem model matches any of: Qualcomm 315 5g IoT Modem, Qualcomm Aqt1000, Qualcomm Ar8031, Qualcomm Ar8035, Qualcomm C V2x 9150, Qualcomm Csr8811, Qualcomm Csra6620, or Qualcomm Csra6640
-
Confirm the firmware versionQuery the modem firmware version using AT commands such as AT+CGMR or ATI (results vary by modem; consult vendor documentation)Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is any version of the affected modems listed in step 1 (all versions are affected)
-
Verify DSM configuration statusCheck if the Data Services Module (DSM) is enabled in the modem configuration. This may require vendor-specific AT commands or accessing the modem's management interface. Common commands include AT$DSM or checking the NVM configurationAffected if DSM is actively configured or running on the modem (the vulnerability triggers during DSM item allocation)
If you are running any version of the listed Qualcomm modem firmware with DSM enabled, your environment is affected by this vulnerability and the modem may become unresponsive or crash during DSM operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataContact the modem chipset/vendor for available firmware updates that address this vulnerability; implement network-side monitoring to detect modem availability issues as a compensating control.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-24847 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-24847 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data