FortiguestApplication · Fortinet
CVE-2023-25604
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn insertion of sensitive information into log file vulnerability in Fortinet FortiGuest 1.0.0 allows a local attacker to access plaintext passwords in the RADIUS logs.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiGuest 1.0.0 logs RADIUS authentication requests including plaintext passwords, allowing a local attacker with file system access to read sensitive credential data from the log files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
FortiguestApplication
= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiGuest installation and versionLocate the FortiGuest installation directory and check the installed version (expected: 1.0.0). Use system package manager or check application metadata files if available.Affected if FortiGuest version 1.0.0 is installed on the system.
-
Confirm RADIUS authentication is configuredCheck FortiGuest configuration for RADIUS authentication settings. Look for RADIUS server definitions, shared secrets, and user authentication methods pointing to RADIUS.Affected if RADIUS authentication is enabled and users authenticate via RADIUS.
-
Locate FortiGuest log filesFind FortiGuest log directory - typically within the application installation path or system logging location. Search for log files with names indicating authentication or RADIUS activity.Affected if Log files exist in the FortiGuest environment.
-
Inspect logs for plaintext passwordsOpen recent FortiGuest authentication logs and search for plaintext password strings in RADIUS authentication entries. Look for patterns like 'password=', 'Password:', or visible credential data in auth request records.Affected if Log files contain RADIUS authentication entries with plaintext (not hashed or masked) password data.
The environment is affected if FortiGuest 1.0.0 is running with RADIUS authentication enabled and log files contain plaintext passwords in authentication records.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch when available; in the interim, restrict file system access to authorized administrators only and audit/revoke any potentially exposed credentials.
Fix this in Fortiguest
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-25604 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-25604 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data