CVE-2023-26203
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability [CWE-798] in FortiNAC-F version 7.2.0, FortiNAC version 9.4.2 and below, 9.2 all versions, 9.1 all versions, 8.8 all versions, 8.7 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to access to the database via shell commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiNAC contains hard-coded credentials (CWE-798) embedded in the software that allow an authenticated attacker to execute shell commands and gain unauthorized access to the database. The vulnerability exists across multiple version branches (8.7 through 9.4.2 and FortiNAC-F 7.2.0), indicating a systemic issue in credential management.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.7.0, <= 9.2.7>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.3= 7.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiNAC installed versionLog into FortiNAC via CLI (ssh) or navigate to System > Settings > General in the web UI. Run command: fnsysctl get system status or check the dashboard for version informationAffected if Version falls within >= 8.7.0 through 9.2.7, OR >= 9.4.0 through 9.4.2, OR is exactly 7.2.0 (FortiNAC-F)
-
Confirm FortiNAC-F variant versionIf running FortiNAC-F (appliance model ending in F), verify the specific build version. Check via: fnsysctl ls /opt or look for version file in /ng/bin/Affected if Version is exactly 7.2.0 for FortiNAC-F variant
-
Verify vulnerability presence via version matchSince CVE-2023-26203 stems from hardcoded credentials embedded in the software binary, the vulnerability exists in all affected versions regardless of configuration. No specific feature or setting must be enabled.Affected if Installed version matches any of the affected ranges: 8.7.0-9.2.7, 9.4.0-9.4.2, or FortiNAC-F 7.2.0
You are affected if your FortiNAC or FortiNAC-F version falls within the listed vulnerable ranges; the hardcoded credentials are present in the software binary of any affected version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.4.3
Apply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a fixed version as specified in Fortinet's security advisory. Review and rotate any credentials that may have been exposed, and limit administrative access to trusted personnel.
FortiNAC version 9.4.3 or later (for FortiNAC-F 7.2.0, contact Fortinet for specific guidance)
- 1. Identify the current FortiNAC version by accessing the admin UI or running 'forticacd --version' via CLI
- 2. For FortiNAC versions 8.7.x through 9.2.7: Plan upgrade to version 9.4.3 or later
- 3. For FortiNAC versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.2: Plan upgrade to version 9.4.3 or later
- 4. For FortiNAC-F version 7.2.0: Contact Fortinet support for patch availability or upgrade path, as version 7.2.0 is listed as affected only
- 5. Review Fortinet release notes for 9.4.3 to confirm the hard-coded credentials vulnerability (CVE-2023-26203) is addressed
- 6. Schedule maintenance window and perform backup of configuration
- 7. Execute upgrade following Fortinet official upgrade guide for your deployment model
- 8. After upgrade, verify the system is operational and the vulnerability is resolved by confirming hard-coded credentials are no longer present in the system
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-26203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-26203 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data