CVE-2023-26496
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Samsung Baseband Modem Chipset for Exynos Modem 5123, Exynos Modem 5300, Exynos 980, Exynos 1080, and Exynos Auto T5124. Memory corruption can occur due to improper checking of the parameter length while parsing the fmtp attribute in the SDP (Session Description Protocol) module.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in Samsung baseband modems (Exynos 5123, 5300, 980, 1080, Auto T5124) due to improper bounds checking when parsing the fmtp attribute in SDP messages, allowing potential buffer overflow and remote code execution in the modem domain.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device baseband modem modelCheck the device specifications or use AT commands (e.g., AT+CGMM, AT+CGMR) to query the modem model. For Samsung devices, also check in Settings > About Phone > Modem Firmware or through service codes.Affected if The modem model is Exynos 5123, 5300, 980, 1080, or Auto T5123
-
Confirm Exynos baseband chipset variantCross-reference the modem model with Samsung's chipset documentation or baseband processor identification tools to verify it is an Exynos family baseband processor.Affected if The device uses any Samsung Exynos baseband chipset from the affected list
-
Verify baseband firmware versionQuery the baseband firmware version via AT commands (AT+CGMR) or check in device engineering/bootloader mode. For most consumer devices, this information may be accessible through field test mode (*#*#4636#*#*) or OEM diagnostic tools.Affected if Any version of the affected Exynos modem firmware is installed (all versions are vulnerable)
-
Confirm VoLTE/VoNR service is activeCheck if Voice over LTE or Voice over NR is enabled on the device (Settings > Connections > Mobile Networks > VoLTE). The vulnerability triggers when processing SDP messages during call setup.Affected if VoLTE or VoNR is enabled and the device uses an affected Exynos baseband modem (SDP fmtp parsing occurs during VoLTE/VoNR call establishment)
A device is affected if it contains any Samsung Exynos baseband modem (5123, 5300, 980, 1080, or Auto T5123) and has VoLTE/VoNR service enabled, regardless of firmware version since all versions are vulnerable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor firmware security updates from Samsung/OEMs to address the baseband modem vulnerability; this is a firmware-level issue requiring patch deployment rather than application-layer mitigation.
- Check Samsung's official security advisory page (security.samsung.com or semiconductor.samsung.com) for available firmware updates for your specific Exynos modem model
- Contact Samsung Semiconductor or your device manufacturer to request the patched firmware for Exynos Modem 5300, Exynos Modem 5123, Exynos 980, Exynos 1080, or Exynos Auto T5123
- Apply the Samsung-provided firmware update through your device manufacturer or Samsung's official update channels
- Verify the SDP fmtp parsing vulnerability is addressed in the applied firmware version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-26496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-26496 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data