CVE-2023-26497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Samsung Baseband Modem Chipset for Exynos Modem 5123, Exynos Modem 5300, Exynos 980, Exynos 1080, and Exynos Auto T5125. Memory corruption can occur when processing Session Description Negotiation for Video Configuration Attribute.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in Samsung Exynos baseband modems (5123, 5300, 980, 1080, Auto T5125) triggered during Session Description Protocol (SDP) negotiation for video configuration attributes. The lack of proper bounds checking when parsing video-related SDP content allows an attacker to overflow memory buffers, potentially achieving remote code execution in the modem's trusted execution environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Exynos modem modelQuery the modem using AT commands such as AT+CGMM (model), AT+CGMI (manufacturer), or AT+CGSN (IMEI) to determine the chipset. Alternatively, check device system information or modem diagnostics if available.Affected if The device contains Exynos Modem 5123, 5300, 980, 1080, or Auto T5123.
-
Check the modem firmware versionQuery the firmware version using AT+CGMR or similar modem AT commands. Compare against any available version information from Samsung's security advisories.Affected if All firmware versions of the affected modems are vulnerable; if the modem is one of the listed models, it is affected regardless of version.
-
Determine if video SDP negotiation is in useMonitor network traffic or modem logs for SDP (Session Description Protocol) messages, particularly those containing video configuration attributes (e.g., m=video lines, a=fmtp, a=rtpmap). Check if the device initiates or responds to video calls or streaming sessions.Affected if The vulnerability is triggered specifically during SDP negotiation for video configuration; if video SDP is processed by the modem, the exploit path exists.
-
Inspect for anomalous modem behavior or crashesReview modem crash logs, baseband dump files, or device kernel logs (via adb logcat or similar) for memory corruption indicators, unexpected reboots, or baseband subsystem failures. Check for any unexpected modem restart events.Affected if Unexpected modem crashes, memory corruption signatures, or baseband subsystem failures may indicate attempted or successful exploitation.
-
Analyze network traffic for malformed SDP packetsIf you have access to network taps or can capture baseband traffic, inspect SDP packets for unusually long video attribute values, overflow patterns, or unexpected field lengths that could indicate exploitation attempts.Affected if Malformed SDP packets with oversized video configuration attributes indicate active exploitation attempts against this vulnerability.
A device containing any of the affected Exynos modem models (5123, 5300, 980, 1080, or Auto T5123) that processes video SDP traffic is vulnerable to this issue.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware updates from Samsung for affected chipset generations. Until patches are available, limit exposure by avoiding untrusted network connections and monitoring for anomalous modem behavior.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,704.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-26497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-26497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data